Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2011
DOI: 10.1080/01629778.2011.597131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of the European Union on Sub-National Mobilization in A Unitary State: The Case of Estonia

Abstract: The discussion of multi-level governance and sub-national mobilization has become a critical case for those concerned with the political and institutional consequences of European integration. The evidence so far indicates that the EU impact on the empowerment of the sub-national level has not been as uniform within member states as the multi-level governance concept traditionally would assume. This article explores the Europeanization impact on sub-national mobilization in Estonia. The results of the study ad… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
1
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, policy-seeking purposes were predominant in the strategies undertaken by the Autonomous Regions of Azores and Madeira; fund-seeking purposes dominated in the rest of the cases. These conclusions corroborate previous findings from Oikonomou (2016) and Tatar (2011) on the Greek and Estonian cases, respectively. In sum, in our sample of 5 case-studies, territorial engagement in the EU has resulted in 'decentralization' in the Portuguese Autonomous Regions and in 'modest decentralization' in the rest of the cases.…”
Section: Modest Decentralizationsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…However, policy-seeking purposes were predominant in the strategies undertaken by the Autonomous Regions of Azores and Madeira; fund-seeking purposes dominated in the rest of the cases. These conclusions corroborate previous findings from Oikonomou (2016) and Tatar (2011) on the Greek and Estonian cases, respectively. In sum, in our sample of 5 case-studies, territorial engagement in the EU has resulted in 'decentralization' in the Portuguese Autonomous Regions and in 'modest decentralization' in the rest of the cases.…”
Section: Modest Decentralizationsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Számos politológiai kutatás témája az EU csatlakozás közigazgatásra gyakorolt hatása, a kormányzás új módszereinek elterjedése, a többszintű kormányzás és a decentralizáció kérdései 6. E kutatásokban természetszer űen csak egy részterületet jelent a strukturális támogatások felhasználása, bár egyes tanulmányok, illetve projektek kifejezetten erre a kérdésre koncentrálnak (Scherpereel 2006;Musialkowska-Sapala-Gazda 2007;Hermann-Pawtowska 2008;Dezséri-Vida 2007;Tatar 2009).…”
Section: Szakirodalmi Elméleti Keretekunclassified
“…6 A többszintű kormányzással, az "europaizációval", a kormányzás új módszereinek elterjedésével foglalkozó kutatási projektek, kiadványok, konferenciák sorát nehéz lenne felsorolni. A nemzetközi irodalom jó összefoglalását adja Tatar (2009). Nemzetközi szinten is megjelen ő magyar szerz ők Bruszt László, Ágh Attila, illetve magyar részvétellel lefolytatott kutatási projekt a hatodik EU keretprogram keretében a NEWGOV projekt.…”
Section: Jegyzetekunclassified
“…Source: Authors' own. Tools are described in detail in AllThings.bioPRO project deliverables[87,104] and Supplementary S1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%