2022
DOI: 10.2298/tsci2205043l
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of the energy transition on China’s economy under the carbon peaking and carbon neutrality goal: A simulation analysis based on the CGE model

Abstract: With the acceleration of the global response to climate change, China announced to the world in 2020 the goals of carbon peaking by 2030 and carbon neutrality by 2060, which reflects its firm determination implement Intended Nationally Determined Contributions. Energy transition is the key to achieving the carbon peaking and carbon neutrality goals. It is of great theoretical and practical significance to study the impact of low carbon energy transition on China?s macro-economy under the carb… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Positive Energy transition has a benign net impact on economic development [3,32,42,62,66,87,100] Negative Energy transition may hinder economic development [19,36,43,46,119] Bidirectional Different energy transition paths, countries, or time periods lead to different results of economic development [21,25,41,44,59] Most scholars believe that energy transition itself seems to have a benign net impact on the macroeconomic fundamentals [66] as it fosters the adoption of economic means and solutions [87]. A macroeconomic model that considers regional, economic, and sectoral characteristics was used in [3], which found that energy transition provides opportunities for economic enhancement.…”
Section: Conclusion Opinion Some Supporting Literaturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Positive Energy transition has a benign net impact on economic development [3,32,42,62,66,87,100] Negative Energy transition may hinder economic development [19,36,43,46,119] Bidirectional Different energy transition paths, countries, or time periods lead to different results of economic development [21,25,41,44,59] Most scholars believe that energy transition itself seems to have a benign net impact on the macroeconomic fundamentals [66] as it fosters the adoption of economic means and solutions [87]. A macroeconomic model that considers regional, economic, and sectoral characteristics was used in [3], which found that energy transition provides opportunities for economic enhancement.…”
Section: Conclusion Opinion Some Supporting Literaturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Ref. [44] established three scenarios and found that the impact of different energy transition paths on the macroeconomic performance of China is inconsistent. Energy transition has a positive contribution to the decoupling process in high-income economies, while it does not have a positive contribution to the decoupling process in middle-to high-income and middle-to low-income economies.…”
Section: Conclusion Opinion Some Supporting Literaturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the next stage, the focus of deepening the reform of the electricity system has shifted comprehensively to improving the construction of the electricity market mechanism. Meanwhile, carbon capture and utilization and storage (CCUS) is an important technology option to achieve the goal of carbon neutrality [2]. In recent years, China has attached great importance to the development of CCUS technology, and the maturity of related technologies has been rapidly improved, and a series of demonstration projects have been put into operation, showing the development trend that new technologies are emerging, efficiency is continuously improved, and energy costs are gradually reduced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%