2005
DOI: 10.1007/s10834-005-3523-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of the Economic Transition in Poland on Vulnerable Populations

Abstract: The economic changes that began with the fall of communism in 1989 have helped Poland to establish one of the strongest economies in Eastern Europe today. Not all parts of society have benefited equally from the positive economic picture however. Those who are unemployed, living on a pension, single parents, or residents of rural communities are at risk of living in poverty in Poland's new economic environment. This paper assesses the views of people in these four groups in terms of their perceived need for ba… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Poverty, pauperization of parts of society and homelessness increased dramatically and inequality intensified. Especially women, large families and the unemployed were adversely affected (Bronson et al, 2005). The unemployment rate rose from 0.3 percent in 1990 to 14.4 percent in 2007 (Modry, 2009).…”
Section: Current Situation Of Childcare In Polandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Poverty, pauperization of parts of society and homelessness increased dramatically and inequality intensified. Especially women, large families and the unemployed were adversely affected (Bronson et al, 2005). The unemployment rate rose from 0.3 percent in 1990 to 14.4 percent in 2007 (Modry, 2009).…”
Section: Current Situation Of Childcare In Polandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the figure is low relative to the US and other European countries, the 16% of Polish children born to unwed parents represents an increase of more than double since the early 1990s (GUS 2005). Without social provisions, single parent households become disproportionately prone to poverty (Bronson, Kunovich, and Frysztacki 2005). As with maternity leave, however, the state has sought to minimize expenditures by narrowing the scope of eligibility and decreasing benefits.…”
Section: Parental Leave Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%