The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on scientific research in the life sciences

Abstract

The COVID-19 outbreak has posed an unprecedented challenge to humanity and science. On the one side, public and private incentives have been put in place to promptly allocate resources toward research areas strictly related to the COVID-19 emergency. However, research in many fields not directly related to the pandemic has been displaced. In this paper, we assess the impact of COVID-19 on world scientific production in the life sciences and find indications that the usage of medical subject headings (MeSH) has changed following the outbreak. We estimate through a difference-in-differences approach the impact of the start of the COVID-19 pandemic on scientific production using the PubMed database (3.6 Million research papers). We find that COVID-19-related MeSH terms have experienced a 6.5 fold increase in output on average, while publications on unrelated MeSH terms dropped by 10 to 12%. The publication weighted impact has an even more pronounced negative effect (-16% to -19%). Moreover, COVID-19 has displaced clinical trial publications (-24%) and diverted grants from research areas not closely related to COVID-19. Note that since COVID-19 publications may have been fast-tracked, the sudden surge in COVID-19 publications might be driven by editorial policy.

Updated Trends on the Biodiscovery of New Marine Natural Products from Invertebrates

“…It is certainly worth investigating what trends will emerge during the 2020s. Nonetheless, we may have to wait until half of the present decade has passed before understanding if there is indeed a decrease in the yielding of NMNPIs, as data from 2020-2022 could be biased due to the limitations imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic; a caveat already acknowledged in other research fields [18].…”

Is Endemicity a Solution for the COVID-19 Pandemic? The Four E's Strategy for the Public Health Leadership

“…In particular, multidisciplinary scientific research contributed enormously to the rapid identification of drugs and vaccines, as well as providing evidence about the mechanisms of action of the virus and consequently also of the effectiveness of containment measures. Basic research, clinical trials and epidemiological studies have helped to expand knowledge about COVID-19 with unprecedented rapidity ( 52 – 54 ). However, in some cases policymakers, discouraged from making unpopular decisions, have ignored scientific evidence, with devastating effects in their countries ( 55 – 57 ).…”

Bibliometric Analysis of Literature on Physical Activity and COVID-19

“…A study by Raynaud et al showed a rise in COVID-19 related publications and a decrease in the proportion of non-COVID-19 publications in high-impact medical journals [ 10 ]. Riccaboni and Verginer analyzed the impacts of COVID-19 on research in the PubMed database and found the COVID-19 pandemic induced a sudden surge in COVID-19 related publications [ 11 ]. In contrast, non-COVID-19 research areas experienced a remarkable reduction in overall publishing rates and funding [ 11 ].…”

“…Riccaboni and Verginer analyzed the impacts of COVID-19 on research in the PubMed database and found the COVID-19 pandemic induced a sudden surge in COVID-19 related publications [ 11 ]. In contrast, non-COVID-19 research areas experienced a remarkable reduction in overall publishing rates and funding [ 11 ].…”