2021
DOI: 10.47326/ocsat.2021.02.42.1.0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Opioid-Related Harm in Ontario

Abstract: The Ontario COVID-19 Science Advisory Table is a group of scientific experts and health system leaders who evaluate and report on emerging evidence relevant to the COVID-19 pandemic, to inform Ontario's response. Our mandate is to provide weekly summaries of relevant scientific evidence for the COVID-19 Health Coordination Table of the Province of Ontario, integrating information from existing scientific tables, Ontario's universities and agencies, and the best global evidence. The Science Table summarizes its… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Before the COVID-19 pandemic, only stabilized OAT patients who regularly attended daily observed doses over a sufficient period (typically ≥2 months) and routinely cleared urine drug screening (to rule out other opioid use) could receive days’ to weeks’ worth of take-home (non-observed) methadone or buprenorphine/naloxone doses per dispensation ( Eibl et al, 2017 ; Government of Ontario, 2018 ). However, during the pandemic, compliance with provincial COVID-19 emergency orders and public health guidelines by OAT dispensaries could result in reduced operating hours, reduced capacity, or temporary closures (e.g., due to outbreaks), thereby hindering treatment access at these sites ( Canadian Centre on Substance Use and Addiction, 2020 ; Friesen et al, 2021 ; Nguyen & Buxton, 2021 ). Even without such service interruptions, Ontarians with opioid use disorder may be deterred from initiating or maintaining OAT during the pandemic to mitigate their risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection or transmission, as treatment requires regular in-person clinical encounters ( Eibl et al, 2017 ; Government of Ontario, 2018 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before the COVID-19 pandemic, only stabilized OAT patients who regularly attended daily observed doses over a sufficient period (typically ≥2 months) and routinely cleared urine drug screening (to rule out other opioid use) could receive days’ to weeks’ worth of take-home (non-observed) methadone or buprenorphine/naloxone doses per dispensation ( Eibl et al, 2017 ; Government of Ontario, 2018 ). However, during the pandemic, compliance with provincial COVID-19 emergency orders and public health guidelines by OAT dispensaries could result in reduced operating hours, reduced capacity, or temporary closures (e.g., due to outbreaks), thereby hindering treatment access at these sites ( Canadian Centre on Substance Use and Addiction, 2020 ; Friesen et al, 2021 ; Nguyen & Buxton, 2021 ). Even without such service interruptions, Ontarians with opioid use disorder may be deterred from initiating or maintaining OAT during the pandemic to mitigate their risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection or transmission, as treatment requires regular in-person clinical encounters ( Eibl et al, 2017 ; Government of Ontario, 2018 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…pandemic-related stressors and disruptions in treatment access and supportive services, particularly at the start of the pandemic) may have contributed to these trends. 2 Furthermore, individuals with SUDs are a marginalized population that may have been more vulnerable to the social and economic pressures associated with the COVID-19 pandemic than the general population. 4 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rates of alcohol- and opioid-related harms, including emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalizations, and deaths caused by alcohol or opioids, have increased since the beginning of the pandemic. 1 , 2 It has been hypothesized that these increases in harms were driven by increased substance use by individuals with a prepandemic alcohol-use disorder (AUD) or opioid-use disorder (OUD) rather than by greater substance use during the pandemic in the general population. 3 , 4 Despite the face validity of these concerns, there is limited data on changes in mortality for individuals with prepandemic substance use disorders (SUDs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, closing schools and businesses to in person gatherings can have a differential impact among people in a community and likely widen already existing inequities. Studies have hinted at possible increases, likely due, in part, to stresses of lockdown and the existential threat of infection, in body mass 11 (which, for example, may increase the incidence of heart disease, vascular disease, and diabetes), alcohol intake (which may lead to increases in cancer and heart disease), 12 , 13 intimate partner violence, 14 mental health burden, 15 , 16 and drug overdose 17 over the course of the pandemic. We also saw the delay or cancellation of medical procedures 18 —what impact that may have on long‐term outcomes for those patients is not yet clear.…”
Section: What We (Ought To) Measure and Why?mentioning
confidence: 99%