2022
DOI: 10.31014/aior.1993.05.04.604
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of the Cognitive Conflict Approach on the Elimination of the Misconception in Square Root Numbers

Abstract: Although the mathematics community has long accepted the concept of limit as the foundation of modern Calculus, the concept of limit itself has been marginalized in undergraduate Calculus education. In this paper, I analyze the strategy of conceptual conflict to teach the concept of limit with the aid of an online tool -Desmos graphing calculator. I also provide examples of how to use the strategy of conceptual conflict. This graphing calculator provides an interactive, dynamic, and persuasive approach of teac… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because 12 M transformed into LK in the posttest. According to Güveli et al (2022), lack of knowledge is better than misconception. Because the lack of knowledge can be corrected.…”
Section: Discussion and Conclusion About Pretest Posttest Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Because 12 M transformed into LK in the posttest. According to Güveli et al (2022), lack of knowledge is better than misconception. Because the lack of knowledge can be corrected.…”
Section: Discussion and Conclusion About Pretest Posttest Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the students better structured their knowledge with the practices they did, the contradictions they saw, the rebuttal texts they read, and they were able to convert the correct answers that they were not sure of into "I'm sure" answers. Studies show that the CC method is effective in learning and increases learning success (Başer, 2006;Chow & David, 2013;Güveli et al, 2022;Herawaty & Rusdi, 2016;Toka & Aşkar, 2002).…”
Section: Discussion and Conclusion About Pretest Posttest Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations