1999
DOI: 10.1097/00132586-199904000-00020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Systemic Vasoconstrictors on the Cerebral Circulation of Anesthetized Patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Patients (seven males, three females) were aged 38 Ϯ 16 yrs. Median admission Glasgow Coma Scale score was 6 (range, [3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. Studies were performed on day 3.3 Ϯ 1.5 after injury.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients (seven males, three females) were aged 38 Ϯ 16 yrs. Median admission Glasgow Coma Scale score was 6 (range, [3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. Studies were performed on day 3.3 Ϯ 1.5 after injury.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although phenylephrine increases cerebral vascular tone in humans, it can increase [38] or has no influence [39] on cerebral vascular resistance. The use of phenylephrine increases CBF in cardiopulmonary bypass patients [40], healthy subjects [38], and anesthetized patients [41]. However, in other situations, CBF seems unaffected by phenylephrine [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adrenergic agents appear to blunt the hypotensive effect of agents like propofol by causing peripheral vasoconstriction without significant direct cerebrovascular effects, even after head injury. In a TCD ultrasonography study by Strebel,et al,56 conducted in healthy individuals who were anesthetized with propofol, phenylephrine and norepinephrine had no effect on MCA flow velocity despite a 20% increase in MAP. In a cortical contusion injury study by Cherian, et al, 11 early postinjury infusion of phenylephrine increased CBF in the pericontusional area and contralateral hemisphere but only in proportion to the increase in MAP and CPP.…”
Section: Methodological Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%