The impact of surge adaptations on hospitalist care teams during the COVID-19 pandemic utilizing a rapid qualitative analysis approach

Abstract

Background Hospital systems have rapidly adapted to manage the influx of patients with COVID-19 and hospitalists, specialists in inpatient care, have been at the forefront of this response, rapidly adapting to serve the ever-changing needs of the community and hospital system. Institutional leaders, including clinical care team members and administrators, deployed many different strategies (i.e. adaptations) to manage the influx of patients. While many different strategies were utilized in hospitals across the United States, it is unclear how frontline care teams experienced these strategies and multifaceted changes. As these surge adaptations likely directly impact clinical care teams, we aimed to understand the perceptions and impact of these clinical care and staffing adaptations on hospitalists and care team members in order to optimize future surge plans. Methods Qualitative, semi-structured interviews and focus groups with hospitalist physicians, advanced practice providers (APPs), and hospital nursing and care management staff at a quaternary academic medical center. Interviews focused on the impact of COVID-19 surge practices on the following areas: (1) the experience of clinical care teams with the adaptations used to manage the surge (2) the perception and experience with the communication strategies utilized (3) the personal experience with the adaptations (i.e. how they impacted the individual) and (4) if participants had recommendations on strategies for future surges. We utilized rapid qualitative analysis methods to explore themes and subthemes. Results We conducted five focus groups and 21 interviews. Three themes emerged from the work including (1) dynamic clinical experience with a lot of uncertainty, (2) the importance of visible leadership with a focus on sense-making, and (3) the significant emotional toll on care team members. Subthemes included sufficient workforce, role delineation and training, information sharing, the unique dichotomy between the need for flexibility and the need for structure, the importance of communication, and the emotional toll not only on the provider but their families. Several recommendations came from this work. Conclusions COVID-19 surge practices have had direct impact on hospitalists and care team members. Several tactics were identified to help mitigate the many negative effects of COVID-19 on frontline hospitalist providers and care teams.

Content and Duration of Doctor-Patient Communication in Outpatient Oncology Follow-Up Consultations in China

“…The focus of conversations in all three categories is on prescribing and evaluating the results of various tests. Regression analysis showed that the outpatient consultation time of cancer patients who only came for admission procedures was shorter, because the admission process was simpler, and doctors may also prefer simplified communication strategies in the outpatient environment compared with the doctor-patient interaction after the patient was hospitalized [ 24 ].…”

Impact of billing reforms on academic hospitalist physician and advanced practice provider collaboration: A qualitative study

“…We used rapid qualitative methods, which have been reported by others and used by our group. [15][16][17][18][19] These methods have been shown to be useful in dynamic, rapidly changing situations. 15,18,19 This design allowed us to assess focus group participants' experiences on APP utilization and how billing reforms had directly impacted participants.…”

“…[15][16][17][18][19] These methods have been shown to be useful in dynamic, rapidly changing situations. 15,18,19 This design allowed us to assess focus group participants' experiences on APP utilization and how billing reforms had directly impacted participants. Our study was designed to deliver focused and actionable findings from the focus groups.…”

Building a thriving academic hospitalist workforce: A rapid qualitative analysis identifying key areas of focus in the field

“…Following the focus groups, we utilized a rapid qualitative analysis process to analyze the content of the focus groups, applying methods similar to prior work. [17][18][19][20] Rapid qualitative methods have been previously described, consisting of a structured analysis that can be useful in situations of dynamic, rapidly changing real-world situations (such as a pandemic). 18,21 Templated summaries were created for each of the interviews and focus groups.…”