2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2022.117434
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of surface roughness on an additively manufactured acoustic material: An experimental and numerical investigation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there are other factors which may also influence the attenuation of the panel, as is the case of the surface roughness. In this regard, some authors have investigated these effects using computational models [27] or analyzed the case of a coiled-up resonator system using different additive manufacturing techniques [28]. All the same, the previous results show the good absorption performance of the proposed solutions and highlight their tuning capabilities, which are their main advantages when compared to traditional variable air cavity systems, as they avoid the misuse or loss of room space.…”
Section: Variable Solutionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…However, there are other factors which may also influence the attenuation of the panel, as is the case of the surface roughness. In this regard, some authors have investigated these effects using computational models [27] or analyzed the case of a coiled-up resonator system using different additive manufacturing techniques [28]. All the same, the previous results show the good absorption performance of the proposed solutions and highlight their tuning capabilities, which are their main advantages when compared to traditional variable air cavity systems, as they avoid the misuse or loss of room space.…”
Section: Variable Solutionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The resin sample (Figure 1a) is of very high quality in terms of mapping the designed geometry as well as surface smoothness, while the gypsumbased sample (Figure 1c) has rough surfaces and many albeit rather minor geometrical imperfections. It is known, however, that such imperfections, and especially surface roughness, should rather enhance the sound absorbing properties [6,7]. More importantly, it was found that the skeleton 3D printed from gypsum powder is microporous and permeable, with the experimentally determined mi-croporosity ϕ m = 44% and static permeability K 0m = 1.64 • 10 −12 m 2 .…”
Section: D Printed Samplesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Numerous references with the formulation of innovative structures designs and simulation methods have been published [2][3] [4], while only a few of them cover the fundamentals for the actual sample preparation and measurements. Usually, the prototype samples are manufactured in the 3D printing process and some works on the resulting surface roughness and its influence on the simulated sound absorption coefficient values have been published [5]- [7]. In the current project, we have experienced a great dispersion in the measured and simulated sound absorption values in a prototyped singlecell metamaterial structures, and one of the explanations for this phenomenon was the additional sound absorption of the bare material walls manufactured with 3D printing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%