The impact of supply chain complexities on supply chain resilience: the mediating effect of big data analytics

Abstract

Supply chains (SC) are increasingly complex and if the resulting complexity is not managed effectively, it could lead to adverse consequences for the firm. The effect big data analytics (BDA) can have on managing distinct types of SC complexity is not well understood in the extant literature. Based on a sample of 166 firms from Pakistan, this study empirically investigates the effects of BDA, and of structural and dynamic SC complexities, on SC resilience. The study also investigates the role of BDA as a mediator between SC complexities and SC resilience. We find that structural SC complexity positively affects SC resilience, while there doesn't seem to be a significant impact for dynamic SC complexity. We also find a mediating effect of BDA for structural and dynamic SC complexities on SC resilience. Our results contribute to the extant literature investigating BDA and SC resilience by offering a more nuanced understanding of distinct types of SC complexities. We establish a more critical understanding of the role of BDA in mediating the critical link between the two types of SC complexity and SC resilience. The proposed model highlights that there are both direct and indirect effects between structural SC complexity and SC resilience, however dynamic SC complexity only influences SC resilience via BDA. These findings provide strategic insights for SC executives as to where to invest in BDA to build much needed SC resilience.

Big data and big disaster: a mechanism of supply chain risk management in global logistics industry

“…Although some leading attempts have investigated the influence of big data on supply chain resilience (Bag et al. , 2021; Bahrami and Shokouhyar, 2022; Iftikhar et al. , 2022), their works, on the one hand, primarily focus on manufacturing and service sectors; on the other hand, they have not mentioned the distinction between utilizing big data to develop preventive or reactive strategies.…”

Untangling the complexity generating material delivery “schedule instability”: insights from automotive OEMs

“…, 2022), social, environmental, and financial performance (Wiengarten et al. , 2017), SC resilience and disruptions (Bode and Wagner, 2015; Iftikhar et al. , 2022), purchasing performance (Ateş and Memiş, 2021), innovation performance (Sharma et al.…”

Guest editorial: Challenges and opportunities for increasingly turbulent times in business markets

“…In this special issue, we address this through the consideration of ten articles carefully selected to reflect different challenges and opportunities in the present and future complex service networks in which firms will be operating. This means increased awareness of risk management and resilience in the approaches adopted and sustained in B2B (Iftikhar et al , 2022). It is common to see research focus on business-to-consumer and B2B manufacturing, but this special issue considers articles that reflect the challenges and that discuss different aspects of emerging B2B marketing strategies following the pandemic.…”

“…B2B services marketing has seen an increase in value cocreation strategies (Jouny-Rivier et al, 2017), servitization, digitalization and gamification, to name just a few of its latest trends (de Jong et al, 2021). With the growth of companies adopting servitization strategies, the lines are blurred once again and what we have seen in industrial marketing is an increase of bundled approaches assisted by digitalization to respond to current market pressures including changing demand and competitor/customer pressures.…”

“…With the growth of companies adopting servitization strategies, the lines are blurred once again and what we have seen in industrial marketing is an increase of bundled approaches assisted by digitalization to respond to current market pressures including changing demand and competitor/customer pressures. These trends come as a consequence of increased complexity in service networks and the need for increased collaboration (Jouny-Rivier et al, 2017;Zolkiewski et al, 2017;Keränen and Prior, 2020). The strength of those relationships dictates the success of B2B service providers and is influenced by perceived value, switching costs and relationship quality (satisfaction, trust and affective commitment) (Gounaris, 2005;Barry et al, 2008).…”