2001
DOI: 10.1093/heapol/16.3.273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of supervision on stock management and adherence to treatment guidelines: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract: Ensuring the availability of essential drugs and using them appropriately are crucial if limited resources for health care are to be used optimally. While training of health workers throughout Zimbabwe in drug management (including stock management and rational drug use) resulted in significant improvements in a variety of drug use indicators, these achievements could not be sustained, and a new strategy was introduced based on the supervision of primary health care providers. This was launched in 1995 with a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
44
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Neither intervention had significant impact on outcomes, including job satisfaction, patient satisfaction, or quality of hypertension or diabetes care (29); however, the impact of these models may have been limited by not taking a more comprehensive approach. In Zimbabwe, pharmacists and pharmacy technicians without supervision experience were trained to supervise primary health care workers in a three-arm randomized control trial comparing interventions to improve stock management and adherence to treatment guidelines to each other and to a control (88). A comprehensive 2-week supervisor training covered a range of topics including supervision skills, use of checklists, report writing, interpretation of data, and review of stock management and standard treatment guidelines (88).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Neither intervention had significant impact on outcomes, including job satisfaction, patient satisfaction, or quality of hypertension or diabetes care (29); however, the impact of these models may have been limited by not taking a more comprehensive approach. In Zimbabwe, pharmacists and pharmacy technicians without supervision experience were trained to supervise primary health care workers in a three-arm randomized control trial comparing interventions to improve stock management and adherence to treatment guidelines to each other and to a control (88). A comprehensive 2-week supervisor training covered a range of topics including supervision skills, use of checklists, report writing, interpretation of data, and review of stock management and standard treatment guidelines (88).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Zimbabwe, pharmacists and pharmacy technicians without supervision experience were trained to supervise primary health care workers in a three-arm randomized control trial comparing interventions to improve stock management and adherence to treatment guidelines to each other and to a control (88). A comprehensive 2-week supervisor training covered a range of topics including supervision skills, use of checklists, report writing, interpretation of data, and review of stock management and standard treatment guidelines (88). Two supervisor visits to each randomly assigned intervention facility focused on addressing either stock management or treatment guidelines and resulted in statistically significant improvements of overall indicators in both intervention groups as well as improvement in some indicators from the comparator group (88).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It will include lean management as one of the approaches used to improve efficiency and quality in service provider organizations 61 65 ; and, 8) Supervision , defined as routine control visits by senior primary care staff to providers and facilities 66 72 .…”
Section: Intervention and Outcomes Of Interestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quality indicators also contribute to quality improvement. By repeating practice assessments, it is possible to make comparisons between assessments and quantify the impact of interventions [4,5]. Good quality indicators should be specific and comprehensive to evaluate the actual pharmacy practice and should make it simple to assess how well pharmacists perform [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%