2020
DOI: 10.21203/rs.2.24115/v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Summer Vacation on Children’s Obesogenic Behaviors and Body Mass Index: A natural experiment.

Abstract: Background: Children’s BMI gain accelerates during summer. The Structured Days Hypothesis posits that the lack of the school day during summer vacation negatively impacts children’s obesogenic behaviors (i.e., physical activity, screen time, diet, sleep). This natural experiment examined the impact of summer vacation on children’s obesogenic behaviors and body mass index (BMI). Methods: Elementary-aged children (n=285, grade=1-5, 48.7% male, 57.4% African American) attending a year-round (n=97) and two match-p… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a natural experiment examining children's obesogenic behaviours during structured and unstructured periods, children's sedentary behaviour, screen time, and sleep timing worsened during a traditional 12‐week summer vacation compared to those who remained in more structured settings (i.e., children attending year‐round school with a shorter 5‐week summer vacation). These behavioural changes corresponded to a statistically significant acceleration in z BMI gain in children during the traditional 12‐week summer vacation suggesting that structured environments have a protective effect on children's health outcomes 24 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In a natural experiment examining children's obesogenic behaviours during structured and unstructured periods, children's sedentary behaviour, screen time, and sleep timing worsened during a traditional 12‐week summer vacation compared to those who remained in more structured settings (i.e., children attending year‐round school with a shorter 5‐week summer vacation). These behavioural changes corresponded to a statistically significant acceleration in z BMI gain in children during the traditional 12‐week summer vacation suggesting that structured environments have a protective effect on children's health outcomes 24 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…20,28,33,[42][43][44][45] Given that children who are Black and children from low-income households experience more dramatic accelerations in BMI during the summer than their White and middle-to-highincome counterparts, 31 days and during the summer when compared to the school year. 21,33,48,49 However, these same studies show that children's bedtimes and wake times shift later and become more variable during the summer. While meeting sleep duration guidelines is protective against developing obesity, 50,51 sleep timing (i.e., late to bed, late to wake) and stability (i.e., keeping bed and wake time constant) have also been shown to be independent risk factors for obesity.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…For instance, a growing number of studies demonstrate that children engage in less physical activity, spend more time sedentary, and spend more time on screens during the summer than during the school year. 19 , 20 , 21 Studies are also emerging that show children engage in healthier amounts of sleep and less variable sleep on nights prior to school days, compared to extended breaks from school, like summer. 20 , 21 , 22 The degradation of health behaviors during summer vacation likely leads to decreased rates of meeting activity, 23 sleep, 24 and screen‐time guidelines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We use the qualifier "biopsychosocial capture" to capture the experiences of the Covid-19 pandemic. These experiences include the biological exposure to the Covid-19 infection and the social and psychological experiences of the Covid-19 attenuation policies, which include lockdown, social distancing, loneliness, financial loss, unemployment [8], secondary health effects (e.g., weight gain) [9], and crime [10]. Many of these biopsychosocial pandemic adversities may be risk factors for psychosis, e.g., loneliness [11] and social defeat [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%