2019
DOI: 10.1039/c8rp00189h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of students’ educational background, interest in learning, formal reasoning and visualisation abilities on gas context-based exercises achievements with submicro-animations

Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to explore and explain students’ achievements in solving context-based gas exercises comprising the macroscopic and submicroscopic levels of chemical concepts. The influence of specific variables, such as interest in learning, formal-reasoning abilities, and visualisation abilities, is a significant factor that should be considered when explaining students’ achievements with context-based exercises. Seventy-nine students of three age groups (12, 16, and 23) participated in the stud… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
(96 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Like Alemdag and Cagiltay's (2018) study, individual differences were examined as a new theme, even though that is one of the multimedia principles. Prior knowledge (Köseo glu et al, 2013;Kragten et al, 2015;O'Keefe et al, 2014), spatial ability (Boucheix et al, 2015;Chen et al, 2015;Kühl et al, 2018), age (Boucheix et al, 2015;Pavlin et al, 2019), and educational background (Pavlin et al, 2019) are the four sub-factors that shape individual differences.…”
Section: Individual Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like Alemdag and Cagiltay's (2018) study, individual differences were examined as a new theme, even though that is one of the multimedia principles. Prior knowledge (Köseo glu et al, 2013;Kragten et al, 2015;O'Keefe et al, 2014), spatial ability (Boucheix et al, 2015;Chen et al, 2015;Kühl et al, 2018), age (Boucheix et al, 2015;Pavlin et al, 2019), and educational background (Pavlin et al, 2019) are the four sub-factors that shape individual differences.…”
Section: Individual Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laboratory work and other practical work are, therefore, also essential in chemistry lessons (Tsaparlis, 2009), which can also be observed in primary and secondary school curricula, which are mainly based on activities at the macroscopic level, indicating that students need to understand chemistry as an experimental discipline (Wissiak Grm & Glažar, 2002). However, the macroscopic level of chemistry is an essential component for students to understand the submicroscopic (particulate) and symbolic levels of chemical concepts (Pavlin, Glažar, Slapničar, & Devetak, 2019). Practical work includes activities in which students handle substances and materials in order to carry out a certain chemical reaction or observe chemistry demonstrations (Hodson, 1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visualisation abilities are not statistically significantly correlated with students' success on items that comprise reading or drawing submicrorepresentations . A similar study was conducted by Pavlin, Glažar, Slapničar and Devetak (2019). The context-based gas exercise is indicated as being difficult for students.…”
Section: Submicrorepresentations Models and Animationsmentioning
confidence: 92%