The Impact of Stimulus Valence and Emotion Regulation on Sustained Brain Activation: Task-Rest Switching in Emotion

Abstract

Task-rest interactions, defined as the modulation of brain activation during fixation periods depending on the preceding stimulation and experimental manipulation, have been described repeatedly for different cognitively demanding tasks in various regions across the brain. However, task-rest interactions in emotive paradigms have received considerably less attention. In this study, we therefore investigated task-rest interactions evoked by the induction and instructed regulation of negative emotion. Whole-brain, functional MRI data were acquired from 55 healthy participants. Two-level general linear model statistics were computed to test for differences between conditions, separately for stimulation and for fixation periods, as well as for interactions between stimulation and fixation (task-rest interactions). Results showed that the regulation of negative emotion led to reverse task-rest interactions (decreased activation during stimulation but increased activation during fixation) in the amygdala as well as in visual cortex regions and to concordant task-rest interactions (increased activation during both, stimulation and fixation) in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex as well as in a number of brain regions at the intersection of the default mode and the dorsal attention networks. Thus, this first whole-brain investigation of task-rest interactions following the induction and regulation of negative emotion identified a widespread specific modulation of brain activation in regions subserving emotion generation and regulation as well as regions implicated in attention and default mode.

Emotion regulation: exploring the impact of stress and sex

“…We had decided to design the factor emotion regulation strategy as a between group factor. The rationale behind this decision was the aim to avoid potential carry over effects in the case of repeatedly changing emotion regulation strategies (as would have been the case in a within subject condition) (Lamke et al, 2014 ). Due to these restrictions a blocked design has been already used in previous studies investigating emotion regulation processes (Banks et al, 2007 ; Bebko et al, 2011 ; Kim and Hamann, 2012 ).…”

Cognitive emotion regulation and personality: an analysis of individual differences in the neural and behavioral correlates of successful reappraisal

“…Interestingly, the extent of the immediate aftereffect in emotional reactivity in the Walter et al (2009) study was positively related to thought suppression. In addition, such paradoxical effects were also observable in different brain regions (prefrontal and occipital regions) after emotion down-regulation and can be seen as task-rest interactions (Lamke et al, 2014). A medium-term regulation effect in a second task, several minutes after the regulation task, has also been shown in participants who were instructed to use detachment to regulate negative emotions (Erk et al, 2010;Walter et al, 2009).…”

A conceptual framework for the neurobiological study of resilience

“…In other words, recovery (or lack thereof) is inherently a temporal phenomenon: (Neuro)physiological parameters of the stress response (reflecting a system state) may recover, may show sensitization, may be perturbed in the long range, or may even show aftereffects long after the acute stressor is gone. For example, it has been shown that the success of effortful emotion regulation in humans can be measured by a reduction of the amygdala signal (Erk et al 2010b;Lamke et al 2014;Walter et al 2009), and that the dynamics of recovery of the amygdala signal are predictive of later amygdala responses to aversive stimulation (Walter et al 2009). Circuits known to be involved in automatic as well as volitional emotion regulation (e.g., functional connectivity between the prefrontal cortex and amygdala) are affected by stressful situations, and changes within these circuits could be observed even long after the stress has waned (Veer et al 2011).…”