2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10490-008-9093-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of state shares on corporate innovation strategy and performance in China

Abstract: State shares, Innovation types, Innovation modes, Innovation performance,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
45
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
45
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study we hypothesize the moderating effects of state ownership while controlling for its direct effect. Following prior studies, we measured state ownership in a Chinese firm as the total percentage of equity ownership by the Chinese government and its agencies (Xu & Zhang, 2008;Zou & Adams, 2008 (Meyer et al, 2009). In our study, we could not access a reliable archival source of Chinese outward FDI and were unable to obtain an index measure on the home country regulatory restrictions on outward FDI.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study we hypothesize the moderating effects of state ownership while controlling for its direct effect. Following prior studies, we measured state ownership in a Chinese firm as the total percentage of equity ownership by the Chinese government and its agencies (Xu & Zhang, 2008;Zou & Adams, 2008 (Meyer et al, 2009). In our study, we could not access a reliable archival source of Chinese outward FDI and were unable to obtain an index measure on the home country regulatory restrictions on outward FDI.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study we hypothesize the moderating effects of state ownership while controlling for its direct effect. Following prior studies, we measured state ownership in a Chinese firm as the total percentage of equity ownership by the Chinese government and its agencies (Xu & Zhang, 2008;Zou & Adams, 2008…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We argue that the effects of home country government support on the global integration strategy of the subsidiary are contingent upon the degree of state ownership of the parent firm for two key reasons. First, state-owned enterprises (SOEs), especially in the case of Chinese SOEs, have privileged access to valuable government-controlled resources, such as cheap financing, low tax rates, and public R&D, which are not available to other types of companies (Deng, 2009;Hong et al, 2015;Morck et al, 2008;OECD, 2008;Xu & Zhang, 2008). Since 2000, Chinese government has actively supported the globalization of SOEs as they are "national champions" (Liang et al, 2015).…”
Section: Moderating Effects Of State Ownership On the Relationship Bementioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, state ownership might compensate for the negative effects of domestic institutional weakness because SOEs can achieve market power based on the access to government resources and the benefits of preferential treatment (Boisot & Meyer, 2008;Luo et al, 2010;Meyer et al, 2014). For example, Chinese SOEs often have in-house research institutes and government-funded R&D investments because they are considered as major actors in the national innovation system (OECD, 2008;Xu & Zhang, 2008). This may offset their foreign subsidiaries' perceptions toward competitive disadvantages resulting from inefficient domestic R&D systems and weak intellectual property protection rights.…”
Section: Moderating Effects Of State Ownership On the Relationship Bementioning
confidence: 99%