The impact of socioeconomic factors on the efficiency of voluntary toxoplasmosis screening during pregnancy: a population-based study

Abstract

BackgroundCongenital toxoplasmosis is associated with severe complications. German state health insurance covers rubella, but not toxoplasmosis, immunity screening. We analysed the effect of socioeconomic factors on the efficiency of private toxoplasmosis screening during pregnancy.MethodsToxoplasmosis and rubella screening data (n = 5402 mothers) were collected within the population-based Survey of Neonates in Pomerania (SNiP).ResultsAt the first-trimester screening, 34.4 % (88.1 %) of expecting mothers were immune to toxoplasmosis (rubella). Susceptibility for toxoplasmosis (rubella) was observed in 39.6 % (8.9 %) and 25.8 % (2.95 %) were not tested. Data on a 2nd screening were available in a subgroup of women with negative immunity showing less than 45 % participation rate. Active toxoplasmosis (no rubella) infection was observed in 0.3 % (n = 17) of pregnant women. A multiple logistic regression model (AIC = 719.67; AUC = 0.725) revealed that the likelihood of participating in a second toxoplasmosis screening increased among women with a good level of education and a steady partnership and decreased with paternal unemployment and the absence of breastfeeding. The highest probability of non-participation in toxoplasmosis screening was found among women with temporal burden and family responsibilities. A cost-benefit analysis showed that covering general screening for toxoplasmosis with health insurance saved costs.ConclusionToxoplasmosis carried a substantial risk of infection during pregnancy. Although increased socioeconomic status was positively associated with the participation in toxoplasmosis screening, this was not the case when pregnant women had strong temporal burden and family responsibilities. This data supports the need for toxoplasmosis screening among pregnant women as a general healthcare benefit covered by insurance.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12884-016-0966-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Evaluation of neonatal and maternal morbidity in mothers with gestational diabetes: a population-based study

“…The stratification pattern was chosen following Lange et al [ 24 ], with some modifications. Due to a low number of cases, the two lowest educational levels (“did not earn a school diploma” and “still at school”) were combined with the level “5 years of secondary school”.…”

Toxoplasmosis in humans and animals in Saudi Arabia: A systematic review

“…For instance, there was no effective vaccine available and no strategic plan to control the disease in pregnant women or children in developing countries. The socioeconomic impact of the disease in these countries will be at high cost in humans and animals, mainly when the abortion occurs [61].…”

Survey of Neonates in Pomerania (SNiP): Study design and cohort update

“…8 circumstances of newborns, children, and their parents. [9][10][11] The broad spectrum of data on the prenatal, perinatal, and postnatal periods has allowed multiple data analyses focusing on clinically relevant topics, including preventive medical check-ups during pregnancy, 12,13 health and health-related risk factors with regard to socio-economic background, 14 and health risk factors and their associated outcome in infancy. 15,16 The SNiP-I-Follow-up study collects information on this cohort in childhood and adolescence in order to investigate the associations between biological, clinical, social, and health care factors in pregnancy and the perinatal period and later health.…”

“…The baseline assessment, carried out between February 2002 and November 2008, generated representative medical, epidemiological, and socio‐economic data concerning public health, associated health care risk factors, and life circumstances of newborns, children, and their parents . The broad spectrum of data on the prenatal, perinatal, and postnatal periods has allowed multiple data analyses focusing on clinically relevant topics, including preventive medical check‐ups during pregnancy, health and health‐related risk factors with regard to socio‐economic background, and health risk factors and their associated outcome in infancy …”