2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2017.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of social threat cues on a card sorting task with attentional-shifting demands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, recent studies have further supported that SA is associated with a struggle to update an initially negative impression of another person in the light of new positive information 16 18 . These deficits appear to be selective to social context 17 , 19 . Those impairments were also found to be specific to positively updating negative information and absent in negatively updating positive information 3 6 , 15 , 16 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Finally, recent studies have further supported that SA is associated with a struggle to update an initially negative impression of another person in the light of new positive information 16 18 . These deficits appear to be selective to social context 17 , 19 . Those impairments were also found to be specific to positively updating negative information and absent in negatively updating positive information 3 6 , 15 , 16 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…SA was found to be associated with detecting angry expressions faster than happy ones (Gilboa-Schechtman et al, 1999;Moriya & Tanno, 2011) and subsequently with greater avoidance of angry faces (Heuer et al, 2007). Moreover, compared to low-SA individuals, high-SA individuals were less able to flexibly update their beliefs when the stimuli involved angry rather than neutral faces (Mohlman & DeVito, 2017). Thus, the third aim of the current study was to test whether SA is associated with enhanced learning and reduced updating of angry facial expressions compared to happy and neutral facial expressions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…There is reason to believe that more reliable methods of assessment, such as the TL‐BS method, may reveal elevated attention bias variability in social anxiety disorder. It is well documented that individuals with social anxiety disorder have impaired executive control of attentional processing (Mohlman & DeVito, 2017; Wieser et al, 2009), a deficit that is thought to contribute to anxiety psychopathology across disorders (Eysenck et al, 2007). Impaired attentional control could lead to problems inhibiting attention to threatening images in the dot‐probe task, which could increase variability in reaction times between trials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%