“…These findings are consistent with prior work, which found that young and middle-aged residents of poor US urban neighbourhoods were at higher risk of early mortality due to chronic diseases 17 18. A recent study linking Veterans Health Administration data with US Census data showed higher hospitalisation rates in white Veterans and in Veterans livings in low-income census tracts 19. Another study mapped hospital days and zip code income for California urban areas, emphasising the importance of disaggregating county-level data by showing a strong association between low zip code income and higher percentage of disability and greater use of hospitals 20.…”
ObjectivesTo study the association of place-based socioeconomic factors with disease distribution by comparing hospitalisation rates in California in 2001 and 2011 by zip code median household income.DesignSerial cross-sectional study testing the association between hospitalisation rates and zip code-level median income, with subgroup analyses by zip code income and race.Participants/settingOur study included all hospitalised adults over 18 years old living in California in 2001 and 2011 who were not pregnant or incarcerated. This included all acute-care hospitalisations in California including 1632 zip codes in 2001 and 1672 zip codes in 2011.Primary and secondary outcomesWe compared age-standardised hospitalisations per 100 000 persons, overall and for several disease categories.ResultsThere were 1.58 and 1.78 million hospitalisations in California in 2001 and 2011, respectively. Spatial analysis showed the highest hospitalisation rates in urban inner cities and rural areas, with more than 5000 hospitalisations per 100 000 persons. Hospitalisations per 100 000 persons were consistently highest in the lowest zip code income quintile and particularly among black patients.ConclusionHospitalisation rates rose from 2001 to 2011 among Californians living in low-income and middle-income zip codes. Integrating spatially defined state hospital discharge and federal zip code income data provided a granular description of disease burden. This method may help identify high-risk areas and evaluate public health interventions targeting health disparities.
“…These findings are consistent with prior work, which found that young and middle-aged residents of poor US urban neighbourhoods were at higher risk of early mortality due to chronic diseases 17 18. A recent study linking Veterans Health Administration data with US Census data showed higher hospitalisation rates in white Veterans and in Veterans livings in low-income census tracts 19. Another study mapped hospital days and zip code income for California urban areas, emphasising the importance of disaggregating county-level data by showing a strong association between low zip code income and higher percentage of disability and greater use of hospitals 20.…”
ObjectivesTo study the association of place-based socioeconomic factors with disease distribution by comparing hospitalisation rates in California in 2001 and 2011 by zip code median household income.DesignSerial cross-sectional study testing the association between hospitalisation rates and zip code-level median income, with subgroup analyses by zip code income and race.Participants/settingOur study included all hospitalised adults over 18 years old living in California in 2001 and 2011 who were not pregnant or incarcerated. This included all acute-care hospitalisations in California including 1632 zip codes in 2001 and 1672 zip codes in 2011.Primary and secondary outcomesWe compared age-standardised hospitalisations per 100 000 persons, overall and for several disease categories.ResultsThere were 1.58 and 1.78 million hospitalisations in California in 2001 and 2011, respectively. Spatial analysis showed the highest hospitalisation rates in urban inner cities and rural areas, with more than 5000 hospitalisations per 100 000 persons. Hospitalisations per 100 000 persons were consistently highest in the lowest zip code income quintile and particularly among black patients.ConclusionHospitalisation rates rose from 2001 to 2011 among Californians living in low-income and middle-income zip codes. Integrating spatially defined state hospital discharge and federal zip code income data provided a granular description of disease burden. This method may help identify high-risk areas and evaluate public health interventions targeting health disparities.
“…New CEHRT functionalities and data types captured in EHRs by PCPs are increasingly used to risk stratify and manage patient populations on a health system or community level [44] , [45] , [46] , [47] . However, the value of such CEHRT functionalities, data types (e.g., social determinants of health) [48] , [49] , [50] and potential data challenges in improving population health quality measures requires additional research [51] , [52] . The methodology used in this study can inform such studies in effectively controlling various population-level moderators and mediators while measuring the net effect of EHR features on population-level quality measures [53] .…”
“…Although there is a strong and compelling body of literature on the observed associations between SBDH and health, to date, diagnosis-based forecasting models used to predict cost and utilization have not yet shown the incremental value of adding SBDH risk factors to predictions. Some published reports using community-level SBDH data contribute only slightly to the predictive model performance beyond individual patient characteristics extracted from EHR data [ 43 , 44 ].…”
Section: Present State Of Including Social and Behavioral Determinantmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather than commercial data, academic centers and government organizations have primarily relied on individual-level clinical information derived from structured and unstructured EHRs [ 51 ] and relevant risk factors on a community level extracted from public surveys [ 52 ], such as the United States Census Bureau American Community Survey, which includes multiple indicators of neighborhood deprivation [ 43 , 53 ]; the Food Access Research Atlas, which describes food deserts [ 54 , 55 ]; and the American Housing Survey, which contains information on housing characteristics [ 56 , 57 ]. In one systematic review of predictive models using EHR data, 36 of the 106 unique studies included SBDH data in one of their final predictive models [ 58 ].…”
Section: Present State Of Including Social and Behavioral Determinantmentioning
In an era of accelerated health information technology capability, health care organizations increasingly use digital data to predict outcomes such as emergency department use, hospitalizations, and health care costs. This trend occurs alongside a growing recognition that social and behavioral determinants of health (SBDH) influence health and medical care use. Consequently, health providers and insurers are starting to incorporate new SBDH data sources into a wide range of health care prediction models, although existing models that use SBDH variables have not been shown to improve health care predictions more than models that use exclusively clinical variables. In this viewpoint, we review the rationale behind the push to integrate SBDH data into health care predictive models and explore the technical, strategic, and ethical challenges faced as this process unfolds across the United States. We also offer several recommendations to overcome these challenges to reach the promise of SBDH predictive analytics to improve health and reduce health care disparities.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.