The Impact of Sleep-Wake Behaviour on Tennis Match Performance in Junior State Grade Tennis Players

Abstract

Purpose To date, no study has investigated the extent to which sleep-wake behaviour (SWB) influences match performance in junior tennis players. This study aimed to assess the influence of SWB for the week and night before on match performance, particularly match analytics and activity. Methods This study recruited 10 junior state grade tennis players who wore an actigraphy device and completed a sleep diary for the week before their match on two separate occasions throughout their competition season. Players wore a global positioning system device to track their movement during matches, and an experienced tennis coach recorded players' match analytics. Results This study showed that the sleep fragmentation index was significantly lower the week before matches in females who had won than those who had lost. Additionally, the sleep fragmentation index was significantly lower the night before a given match than the week before. Only sleep fragmentation index and sleep latency significantly influenced match performance in junior tennis players. The percentage of second serves points won differed between match wins and losses for male players, while winners and forced errors differed for female players. Conclusion These findings provide a detailed profile of tennis match play in junior state grade players. Despite individual differences, reduced restlessness the night before a match coincides with increased match performance.

The association between junior tennis players’ physical and cognitive attributes and groundstroke performance

“…An excellent test re-test reliability has been observed for total time in the TAT (ICC = 0.95; SEM = 0.11; 95% CI = 6.61, 7.04). 34 Each participant was required to stand in a 'ready position' straddling the centre mark of the baseline. The tester, who was standing on the opposing baseline, initiated the test by performing either a forehand or backhand swing.…”

Does time of day and player chronotype impact tennis-specific skills and physical performance?

“…The Tennis-specific agility test decision time has shown moderate test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.70; SEM = 0.08), while the total time has shown excellent test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.95; SEM = 0.11). 28 Each participant performed three trials per session, with the fastest trial of each session included for analysis. Overhead medicine ball throw.…”