1992
DOI: 10.1080/00014788.1992.9729440
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Size, Stock Market Listing and Industry Type on Disclosure in the Annual Reports of Japanese Listed Corporations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

25
377
4
55

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 522 publications
(480 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
25
377
4
55
Order By: Relevance
“…studies that relate the level of disclosure to firm characteristics include Firth (1979); Cooke (1989;1991, and1992);imhoff (1992); malone, Fries and jones (1993); Singhvi and Desai (1971); Heflin, Shaw and Wild (2001);and wallace and naser (1995). these studies provide evidence of the association between disclosure levels and firm characteristics, including firm size; listing status; firm auditor; the scope of business; risk of trading; and industry type.…”
Section: Prior Research and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…studies that relate the level of disclosure to firm characteristics include Firth (1979); Cooke (1989;1991, and1992);imhoff (1992); malone, Fries and jones (1993); Singhvi and Desai (1971); Heflin, Shaw and Wild (2001);and wallace and naser (1995). these studies provide evidence of the association between disclosure levels and firm characteristics, including firm size; listing status; firm auditor; the scope of business; risk of trading; and industry type.…”
Section: Prior Research and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Others found a relationship between sector type and corporate disclosure (Cooke 1992;Mangena and Pike, 2005). In risk reporting studies, Beretta andBozzolan (2004) andRajab andHandley-Schechter (2009) found that risk reporting differs among different industry sectors.…”
Section: Firm Characteristics and Crdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, previous studies have searched for the factors affecting the level of corporate disclosure, while underlining the relevance of variables such as the organization's size and typology, the information asymmetry risk of the market (influencing the potential assumption of opportunistic behaviors), the professional degree of the intermediary agencies (affecting the credibility of the information disclosed), the board composition (also in terms of the presence of women), or the traditional attitude of the management (whose hostility toward the costs of voluntary disclosure may be mainly reduced by strong economic incentives)-e.g., [29][30][31][32][33][34].…”
Section: Corporate Disclosure and Capital Markets: A Brief Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%