The impact of shop floor culture and subculture on lean production practices

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper to examine the impact of shop floor (SF) culture (organizational culture (OC) perceived by workers) and SF subcultures assessed by the competing values framework (CVF) on the perceived use of lean production (LP) practices. Design/methodology/approach The authors analyse questionnaires completed by workers at the single case company undergoing a commonplace lean transformation. The survey items cover both LP items and CVF statements. The propositions are analysed applying cluster analysis and regression. Findings At the case company, the multidimensionality of SF culture only partially exists, and the perceived use of LP practices shows little connection to OC. The considerable differences between SF culture and SF subcultures on the one hand and among SF subcultures on the other hand indicate the existence of a special multidimensional SF culture. Altogether, SF culture’s impact on LP is weak. Practical implications Managers should rethink the usual lean implementation pathways and understand how values pervade SF culture and how culture types impact the perceived use of LP practices at the SF. Managers could face a trade-off: smoother lean transition by engaging in SF subculture-specific transitions and reinforcing it or by developing a homogenous lean SF culture. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first empirical attempt to understand the impact of SF culture on the perceived use of LP practices by adopting a validated OC measurement tool. Furthermore, the study provides insight into workers’ subcultures.

Performance management practices in lean manufacturing organizations: a systematic review of research evidence

“…If managing performance in lean is deeply contextual and practice-related, we need to understand how managers use the various control systems, how these systems interact and, above all, how managers ensure the continuous engagement and participation of the workforce in PM practices. In this sense, the identified gap in understanding how cultural issues affect the use of PM systems and practices suggests a critical avenue for future work, which will complement the existing studies of the effects of culture on lean production itself (Bortolotti, Boscari, and Danese 2015;Losonci et al 2017). Relevant research questions may take the form of 'How do managers in LMOs establish and secure cross-functional support for PM programmes?'…”

“…Here it is important to highlight the distinction between the effects of context and culture on lean production practices themselves, which has been extensively covered in the literature (see e.g. Losonci et al 2017), and such effects on PM practices (Ferreira and Otley's 2009) which are instead the focus of this study.…”

Introducing Lean Six Sigma to a German municipality: an action research report

“…A specific analysis of process culture for local governments cannot be found in the literature. Desirable cultural characteristics regarding the Lean Management philosophy however have been published by several authors (Liker, 2004;Liker and Hoseus, 2008;Angelis et al, 2011;Losonci et al, 2017). Furthermore, the organizational culture has also been shown to have a significant influence to the success of Six Sigma and the related Total Quality Management (McNabb and Sepic, 1995;Dahlgaard and Dahlgaard-Park, 2006).…”

exploration of the application of lean continuous improvement in higher education

“…seek to understand their culture (Arasli, 2002;Atkinson, 2010;Lomas, 2004;Losonci, Kása, Demeter, Heidrich, & Jenei, 2016;Marodin & Saurin, 2014;Temponi, 2005;Zu, Robbins, & Fredendall, 2010). Additionally, employees need to be willing to invest their time in the proposed change (AL-Abbrow & Abrishamkar, 2013).…”

“…As an instrumental case, the focus was on which readiness factors are either advantageous or limiting in the application of LCI at a university. Literature outlined in Chapter Two revealed two critical things: Organizations that choose to implement change via new initiatives like LCI must first seek to understand their culture (Arasli, 2002;Atkinson, 2010;Lomas, 2004;Losonci, Kása, Demeter, Heidrich, & Jenei, 2016;Marodin & Saurin, 2013;Temponi, 2005). When participants' values are in alignment with the organization they will be more likely to embrace change (Agnew & VanBalkom, 2009;Antony, 2014;Gregory, Harris, Armenakis, & Shook, 2009;Smollan & Sayers, 2009).…”