2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2018.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of sex as a biological variable in the search for novel antidepressants

Abstract: A roadblock to successful treatment for anxiety and depression is the high proportion of individuals that do not respond to existing treatments. Different underlying neurobiological mechanisms may drive similar symptoms, so a more personalized approach to treatment could be more successful. There is increasing evidence that sex is an important biological variable modulating efficacy of antidepressants and anxiolytics. We review evidence for sex-specific effects of traditional monoamine based antidepressants an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 183 publications
(212 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Female mice and rats have been reported to be less sensitive than males in their responses to kappa opioid agonists and antagonists (Russell et al, 2014; Abraham et al, 2018; Laman-Maharg et al, 2018; Williams and Trainor, 2018). These sex differences raise important questions about the utility of kappa antagonists in the treatment of stress-disorders in women.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Female mice and rats have been reported to be less sensitive than males in their responses to kappa opioid agonists and antagonists (Russell et al, 2014; Abraham et al, 2018; Laman-Maharg et al, 2018; Williams and Trainor, 2018). These sex differences raise important questions about the utility of kappa antagonists in the treatment of stress-disorders in women.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given evidence for a stimulatory role of the DYN/KOR system in negative affect and affective disorders ( Knoll and Carlezon, 2010 ; Tejeda et al, 2012 ; Van't Veer and Carlezon, 2013 ), it might be expected that the DYN/KOR system would be more sensitive in females than males. However, the few studies that have examined sex differences in responsivity of the DYN/KOR system have generally found females to be less sensitive than males to both activation and inhibition of the DYN/KOR system, both in terms of changes in pain response and affect [see reviews by ( Becker and Chartoff, 2018 ; Chartoff and Mavrikaki, 2015 ; Williams and Trainor, 2018 )]. While the underlying mechanisms driving these sex differences are not well understood, a number of differences have been reported regarding the role of the DYN/KOR system in females, including polymorphisms in the prodynorphin (pDYN) gene, interactions with the melanocortin 1 receptor (MC1R) at the genetic level, heterodimerization of KORs and mu opioid receptors (MORs), and unique interactions with gonadal hormones ( Chartoff and Mavrikaki, 2015 ; Chartoff et al, 2009 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 For example, many studies demonstrate that sex can moderate key outcomes. [15][16][17][18][19] Ignoring sex in these studies would have led to very different conclusions. In an effort to improve the rigor and reproducibility of research studies, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) now requires all NIH-funded research to consider sex as a biological variable (SABV).…”
Section: Scientific Concernsmentioning
confidence: 92%