2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2020.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of sex and cannabis on clinical features in first–admitted patients with psychosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, after controlling for other factors, the trend towards lower cannabis use during the pandemic disappeared. In our sample, as in other studies 40 , a significantly lower percentage of women used cannabis (44.3% vs. 74.5% in men; p < 0.001). Consequently, the lower rates of cannabis use in our full cohort during the pandemic could be attributed to the higher proportion of women in the sample.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…However, after controlling for other factors, the trend towards lower cannabis use during the pandemic disappeared. In our sample, as in other studies 40 , a significantly lower percentage of women used cannabis (44.3% vs. 74.5% in men; p < 0.001). Consequently, the lower rates of cannabis use in our full cohort during the pandemic could be attributed to the higher proportion of women in the sample.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…41 A study conducted in Spain in patients with FEP also found users to be predominantly male who started cannabis use earlier in life. 42 A study conducted in Morocco also reported patients diagnosed with schizophrenia who were using cannabis were young, male, presented earlier in life and had poor adherence to medication. 43 Local findings have also been consistent, with cannabis users being more likely to be young and male.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, many studies into the association between cannabis and psychosis-related disorders did not report separate results for alcohol and tobacco. A number of these studies also did not report that they have controlled for tobacco use (Addington and Addington, 2007; Alemany et al, 2014; Arseneault et al, 2002; Auther et al, 2015; Brañas et al, 2016, 2017; Callaghan et al, 2012; Corcoran et al, 2008; Di Forti et al, 2014; Dragt et al, 2012; Ferdinand et al, 2005; Foti et al, 2010; Freeman et al, 2018; Grech et al, 2005; Harley et al, 2010; Houston et al, 2008; Konings et al, 2008, 2012; Kuepper et al, 2011; Levy and Weitzman, 2019; McGrath et al, 2010; Phillips et al, 2002; Ringen et al, 2016; Rognli et al, 2020; Schubart et al, 2011; Scott et al, 2009; Seddon et al, 2016; Skinner et al, 2011; Smith et al, 2009; Stefanis et al, 2004; Tien and Anthony, 1990; Tosato et al, 2013; Valmaggia et al, 2014; van Os et al, 2002; Verdoux et al, 2003; Vinkers et al, 2013; Wainberg et al, 2021; Weiser et al, 2002), while others did explicitly apply such controls, but did not report odds or risk ratios for tobacco (Arranz et al, 2020; Baeza et al, 2009; Bechtold et al, 2016; Binbay et al 2012; Di Forti et al, 2009; D’Souza et al, 2020; Fergusson et al, 2003, 2005; Fonseca-Pedrero et al, 2020; Henquet et al, 2005; Hides et al, 2009;…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%