2012
DOI: 10.1017/s1355770x12000265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of seed market access and transaction costs on potato biodiversity and yields in Bolivia

Abstract: Using data from Bolivia, this paper analyzes seed market participation and how transaction costs in these markets influence intracrop biodiversity and the influence of biodiversity on yields. Results indicate that seed market attributes such as distance and market-level biodiversity have a crucial effect on a farmer's market choice, suggesting that farmers are willing to sacrifice time and income to travel further distances in order to reach markets with a broader range of varieties. This study finds that farm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The objective of these subsidies was to raise the income of small-scale rural farmers who were not going to be able to compete in the global markets against low-priced imports from relatively productive countries with agricultural sectors that had suitable infrastructure, robust credit markets, extension services, subsidized production and adequate investments in R&D (Pérez, Schlesinger and Wise, 2008). suggests that decoupled payments could influence production decisions 45 , yet only a limited number of evaluations on PROCAMPO's impact have been conducted, and they have generally measured economic welfare, not outcomes associated with agricultural productivity. As pointed out in Salazar, Winters and Maffioli (2010), it is infeasible to carry out an evaluation of the overall effects of the program since it was implemented over two decades ago; therefore, only particular periods or "added impact" can be analyzed.…”
Section: Direct Paymentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The objective of these subsidies was to raise the income of small-scale rural farmers who were not going to be able to compete in the global markets against low-priced imports from relatively productive countries with agricultural sectors that had suitable infrastructure, robust credit markets, extension services, subsidized production and adequate investments in R&D (Pérez, Schlesinger and Wise, 2008). suggests that decoupled payments could influence production decisions 45 , yet only a limited number of evaluations on PROCAMPO's impact have been conducted, and they have generally measured economic welfare, not outcomes associated with agricultural productivity. As pointed out in Salazar, Winters and Maffioli (2010), it is infeasible to carry out an evaluation of the overall effects of the program since it was implemented over two decades ago; therefore, only particular periods or "added impact" can be analyzed.…”
Section: Direct Paymentsmentioning
confidence: 99%