The Impact of Security on the Performance of IPv4 and IPv6 Using 802.11n Wireless LAN

Kolahi, Samad S.; Qu, Zhang; Soorty, Burjiz K.; Chand, Navneet

doi:10.1109/ntms.2009.5384672

Cited by 13 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This standard supports a theoretical throughput of 1.3 Gbps [1]. It is much faster than 802.11n, which provided in practice up to 170 Mbps [8], while it has the theoretical bandwidth in up to 300-500Mbps. The 802.11ac is faster than 802.11n because it uses beamforming technology and bigger channel width [1].…”

Section: Introductionsupporting

confidence: 52%

“…In 2009 and 2011, Kolahi and colleagues [8] In 2011, Li and colleagues [9] evaluated the performance of IEEE 802.11n Wi-Fi peer-peer network for both IPv4 and IPv6 by applying WPA2 security mechanism. Their results for Windows 7 showed that the TCP throughput with WPA2 security decreased by 6.21% (IPv4) and 3.11% (IPv6).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The motivation behind this study is therefore to evaluate 802.11ac for IPv4 and IPv6 with and without WAP2 security. We also determine the actual bandwidth because our previous study in 802.11n [8,9] showed that the theoretical limit cannot be reached.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Impact of security on bandwidth and latency in IEEE 802.11ac client-to-server WLAN

Kolahi

Almatrook

2017

2017 Ninth International Conference on Ubiquitous and Future Networks (ICUFN)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Introductionsupporting

confidence: 52%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Impact of security on bandwidth and latency in IEEE 802.11ac client-to-server WLAN

Kolahi

Almatrook

2017

2017 Ninth International Conference on Ubiquitous and Future Networks (ICUFN)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Narayan et al [13] did a similar work but with Fedora, Ubuntu, and Windows Server as operating systems. Finally, the performance of the IP protocols has also been compared in wireless networks [14][15] [16], and with the use of QoS [17].…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Performance Evaluation of IPv4/IPv6 Transition Mechanisms

Quintero¹,

Sans²,

Gamess

2016

IJCNIS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-The exhaustion of IPv4 addresses has forced the deployment of the new version of the Internet Protocol (IPv6). However, the migration to the new protocol is done gradually and with the due care for many reasons that include: cost, inclusion of support for IPv6 in existing applications, training of technical staff, lack of web content available over IPv6 from important providers, and obsolete devices not anymore supported by manufacturers. For those reasons, many transition mechanisms have been proposed, each one to fill distinct requirements, with different operational theory and availability according to the network environment. A performance evaluation of these mechanisms can help network administrators and researchers in their selection of the best transition technology for their environment. In this paper, we present a performance comparison of some transition mechanisms such as ISATAP, 6to4, and NAT64 in real testbeds with Debian, Windows 7, Windows 8, and Windows 10. For NAT64, two different tools were tested: TAYGA and Jool. We measure the OWD and the throughput for UDP and TCP for every mechanism, for both Ethernet and Fast Ethernet technologies. From this research, we can conclude that all the modern operating systems for PCs already have good support for IPv6, and a very similar network performance. Also, we can infer from our work that in controlled environments, native IPv4 has the best performance, closely followed by native IPv6. The difference is essentially due to the length of the IP header (20 bytes in IPv4 and 40 bytes in IPv6). The tunneling solutions chosen for this research (ISATAP and 6to4) have a similar performance, which is the lowest of the studied technologies, because of the additional IPv4 header in the tunnel.

show abstract

“…The client will be connected wirelessly to the server via the Linksys WAP4410N access point. The client must join the domain and the time must be synchronized with the server before the experiments scenarios could be tested.This was done so as to maintain consistency with similar research shown in the past including the previous work done on 802.11n [2]. The distance between the access point and the workstations was well within two meters in-order to maintain the optimum signal strength.…”

Section: Figure1: Network Test Bedmentioning

confidence: 81%

The influence of WPA2 security on the UDP performance of IPv4 and IPv6 using 802.11n WLAN in Windows 7-Windows 2008 environment

Kolahi

Singla

Ehsan

et al. 2011

2011 Baltic Congress on Future Internet and Communications

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

The Impact of Security on the Performance of IPv4 and IPv6 Using 802.11n Wireless LAN

Cited by 13 publications

References 6 publications

Impact of security on bandwidth and latency in IEEE 802.11ac client-to-server WLAN

Impact of security on bandwidth and latency in IEEE 802.11ac client-to-server WLAN

Performance Evaluation of IPv4/IPv6 Transition Mechanisms

The influence of WPA2 security on the UDP performance of IPv4 and IPv6 using 802.11n WLAN in Windows 7-Windows 2008 environment

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About