2022
DOI: 10.1002/aepp.13286
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of COVID‐19 trade measures on agricultural and food trade

Abstract: This paper assesses the determinants of temporary non‐tariff measures (NTMs) in response to COVID‐19 and their implications for the agricultural and food trade. Using a control function approach, we show that economic and pandemic considerations played an essential role in implementing such NTMs. Relying on variation between treated and untreated varieties, we estimate a dynamic post‐event trade response of 5.4% for import facilitating and −27.5% for export restricting NTMs. After revoking them, their trade ef… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(82 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From a trade perspective, the pandemic could also lead to an increase in food safety concerns in many countries, as sanitary and phytosanitary measures are disproportionately applied within the agri-food sector (Ahn & Steinbach, 2023). Agri-food trade could be disrupted as countries are more likely to enact restrictive trade policies such as food standards.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a trade perspective, the pandemic could also lead to an increase in food safety concerns in many countries, as sanitary and phytosanitary measures are disproportionately applied within the agri-food sector (Ahn & Steinbach, 2023). Agri-food trade could be disrupted as countries are more likely to enact restrictive trade policies such as food standards.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2016) using monthly data. It also occurred following the food price spike in the early 1970s and the price slump in the mid‐1980s (Anderson & Nelgen, 2012), and again during the COVID‐19 outbreak in 2020–21 (Ahn and Steinbach (2022). In those environments, only countries that insulate by more than the average have any hope of stabilizing their domestic prices using this strategy 3 .…”
Section: Short‐term Policy Responses To Market Volatilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The COVID‐19 pandemic has added to inequalities and reduced interest in cross‐border activities. It has added also to trade costs (Ahn & Steinbach, 2022), and added to the mean, variance and uncertainty of shipping times (Carriere‐Swallow et al., 2022; Carter et al., 2022; Komaromi et al., 2022).…”
Section: Recent Disruptions To Global Trade and Ways Forwardmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We excluded import data for 2020 and 2021 from this analysis. As the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic started in the Spring of 2020, we are concerned about potential estimation bias induced by using 2020 and 2021 as control groups to construct the counterfactual for evaluating the trade effects of the Russia-Ukraine war(Ahn & Steinbach, 2022).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%