2015
DOI: 10.1111/twec.12283
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures on Market Entry and Trade Flows

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
87
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(53 reference statements)
8
87
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We find that NTMs imposing a conformity requirement, that is, testing, certification or inspection, significantly reduce the number of countries exporting to a market. This is consistent with previous research by Crivelli and Gröschl () which finds that sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) compliance measures that have been raised as a concern at the WTO reduce the number of countries exporting to a market. However, our current research is much broader, showing that compliance measures have an effect for both SPS and technical barriers to trade (TBT)‐related measures, and the effect is not just for those measures that are sufficiently problematic to be raised at the WTO.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We find that NTMs imposing a conformity requirement, that is, testing, certification or inspection, significantly reduce the number of countries exporting to a market. This is consistent with previous research by Crivelli and Gröschl () which finds that sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) compliance measures that have been raised as a concern at the WTO reduce the number of countries exporting to a market. However, our current research is much broader, showing that compliance measures have an effect for both SPS and technical barriers to trade (TBT)‐related measures, and the effect is not just for those measures that are sufficiently problematic to be raised at the WTO.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Gravity modelling is widely applied, but two applications are of particular relevance to our work . Crivelli and Gröschl () use a Heckman selection model and data on specific concerns about SPS measures raised at the WTO. They find that such SPS measures reduce the probability of exporting to these markets but, conditional on trade occurring, values exported are higher.…”
Section: Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, NTMs can eliminate a market failure by reducing the cost of determining the quality of a product, thereby helping to prevent a lemon problem (Akerlof 1970). This point is also made by Crivelli and Gröschl (2012), Disidier et al (2008), and Ganslandt and Markusen (2001).…”
Section: Non-tariff Measures: Stylized Factsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…These negative effects are less accentuated for larger firms. Similarly, Crivelli and Groeschl (2016) analyze the impact of SPS on both market entry and bilateral trade values of agricultural and food products. The authors find that aggregated SPS measures reduce the probability of entering new markets.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%