The impact of robotics in liver surgery: A worldwide systematic review and short‐term outcomes meta‐analysis on 2,728 cases

Abstract

Background:The dissemination of robotic liver surgery is slow-paced and must face the obstacle of demonstrating advantages over open and laparoscopic (LLS) approaches. Our objective was to show the current position of robotic liver surgery (RLS) worldwide and to identify if improved short-term outcomes are observed, including secondary meta-analyses for type of resection, etiology, and cost analysis.Methods: A PRISMA-based systematic review was performed to identify manuscripts comparing RLS vs open or LLS approaches. Quality analysis was performed using the Newcatle-Ottawa score. Statistical analysis was performed after heterogeneity test and fixed-or random-effect models were chosen accordingly. Results: After removing duplications, 2728 RLS cases were identified from the final set of 150 manuscripts. More than 75% of the cases have been performed on malignancies. Meta-analysis from the 38 comparative reports showed that RLS may offer improved short-term outcomes compared to open procedures in most of the variables screened. Compared to LLS, some advantages may be observed in favour of RLS for major resections in terms of operative time, hospital stay and rate of complications.Cost analyses showed an increased cost per procedure of around US$5000. Conclusions: The advantages of RLS still need to be demonstrated although early results are promising. Advantages vs open approach are demonstrated. Compared to laparoscopic surgery, minor perioperative advantages may be observed for major resections although cost analyses are still unfavorable to the robotic approach.

Robotic resection of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Institutional outcomes of bile duct cancer surgery using a minimally invasive technique

“…This resulted in marginal postoperative outcomes, poor reproducibility, and hindered the adoption of the laparoscopic approach for the treatment of this disease. The advent of robotic surgery provided solutions to the inherent limitations of conventional laparoscopy via superior visualization with a magnified view, tremor filtration, increased dexterity via 7‐degrees of freedom, and a stable platform 7,9,10 It has been widely accepted that minimally invasive liver resections lead to better outcomes when compared to the ‘open’ approach and this likely extrapolates to minimally invasive EHC resection by experienced surgeons when technically feasible. Our case series supports the application of the robotic system for the treatment of EHC at a single high‐volume center, as an alternative to the traditional “open” approach.…”

Can the computed tomography texture analysis of colorectal liver metastases predict the response to first-line cytotoxic chemotherapy?

“…The robotic approach is gradually being introduced in liver surgery and could compensate for the inherent difficulties of the laparoscopic approach. However, only some centers have implemented robotic-assisted surgery and the experience continues to be limited compared to laparoscopy[ 8 ]. In this study, we report an initial experience with our first forty robotic liver resections (RLRs) using the da Vinci Xi System Ò (Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, United States).…”

Robotic Liver Resection. Report of the First 50 Cases

“…Minimally invasive liver resection is a feasible and safe technique and has been used to treat several types of liver neoplasms (1,2) . Robotic surgery has gained growing acceptance in recent years, expanding to liver resection (3)(4)(5)(6) . The robotic approach, with its added degrees of freedom, improved visualization, stability of the robotic platform, and better ergonomics improve the surgeon's dexterity during complex minimally invasive procedures.…”

“…There is a recent interest in robotic liver surgery and the number and complexity of procedures are rapidly increasing (6)(7)(8)(9)(10) . The aim of this paper is to report the experience with our first fifty robotic liver resections.…”