2018
DOI: 10.1080/1046669x.2019.1658011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of retail buyer innovativeness on suppliers’ adaptive selling in Japanese buyer–supplier relationships

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…H3 , H4 and H5 proposed moderating effects of differentiation and low-cost orientation on the direct linkages between strategic integration, buying group’s brand equity and buying group benefits. To test these three hypotheses, this study applied a multi-group analysis, following the procedure adopted by previous studies (Kim and Takashima, 2018). First, based on the mean value of differentiation (mean = 4.02) and low-cost orientation (mean = 4.13), this study divided the total data (241 samples) into two groups: a high group of differentiation ( n = 106) and low-cost orientation ( n = 115) and a low group of differentiation ( n = 135) and low-cost orientation ( n = 126).…”
Section: Analysis and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…H3 , H4 and H5 proposed moderating effects of differentiation and low-cost orientation on the direct linkages between strategic integration, buying group’s brand equity and buying group benefits. To test these three hypotheses, this study applied a multi-group analysis, following the procedure adopted by previous studies (Kim and Takashima, 2018). First, based on the mean value of differentiation (mean = 4.02) and low-cost orientation (mean = 4.13), this study divided the total data (241 samples) into two groups: a high group of differentiation ( n = 106) and low-cost orientation ( n = 115) and a low group of differentiation ( n = 135) and low-cost orientation ( n = 126).…”
Section: Analysis and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on interviews with Japanese retail buying groups, while the two largest groups are reinforcing member retailers’ benefits through new experiments and ideas, the local, smaller retail buying groups are unsure about how to access such benefits and how to get potential retailers interested in becoming their members. Although some studies have offered initial insights into firm performance in dyadic, vertical and horizontal inter-firm relations in Japan (Kim and Takashima, 2018; Kobayashi et al , 2017), practical guidance regarding retailers’ horizontal strategic alliances has received relatively little attention (Kim et al , 2021). Therefore, this study examined Japanese retail buying groups and stimulates further research on various inter-firm relations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With few exceptions (Roberts and Flin, 2020; Kim and Takashima, 2018), the issue of industrial buyer innovativeness has received scant attention, although Hauser et al (2006) indicate a need to examine innovation in portfolio management, among other areas.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most important innovations are those that allow the company to gain a competitive advantage, thus also contributing to its performance (Henard and Szymanski, 2001). Indeed, customer needs change very quickly, and firms can achieve customer value differentiation through innovativeness (Kim et al , 2015; Kim and Takashima, 2018). Innovation means creating value for customers, and it can develop along several dimensions, one of which concerns the offering of new products in the assortment (Sawhney et al , 2006).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%