The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2020.04.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of regional 99mTc-HMPAO single-photon-emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging on clinician diagnostic confidence in a mixed cognitive impairment sample

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Imabayashi et al reported a 12% improvement in quantitative accuracy when using quantification [14]. Semi-quantitative SPECT has also been shown by Prosser et al to be valued by referring clinicians and to improve clinician diagnostic confidence [29]. The use of quantification is crucial for optimising the diagnostic performance of perfusion SPECT and is recommended by the EANM guidelines [9,30].…”
Section: Perfusion Spectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Imabayashi et al reported a 12% improvement in quantitative accuracy when using quantification [14]. Semi-quantitative SPECT has also been shown by Prosser et al to be valued by referring clinicians and to improve clinician diagnostic confidence [29]. The use of quantification is crucial for optimising the diagnostic performance of perfusion SPECT and is recommended by the EANM guidelines [9,30].…”
Section: Perfusion Spectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the existing literature on SPECT in the differential diagnosis of dementias [22][23][24], subjects were filtered for the following labels assigned to their scan's outgoing impressions: dementia, AD, frontotemporal dementia (FTD), cognitive impairment, and neurodegenerative processes. Subjects also had these labels if such processes could not be ruled out during the read.…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ELISA and neuroimaging have been the common methods to study on detection of Aβ42 and other biomarkers [16,17]. Besides, numerous other techniques/methods have been improved for Aβ42 quantification such as fluorescent microscopy, quantum dot nanoprobes, nanomaterials, mass spectrometry, immobilized metal affinity chromatography and meta-analysis, Positron Emission Tomography (PET), Photon and Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography, Regular and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) [18][19][20][21][22]. Laboratory tests include genetic tests, biomarker detections, and CSF analysis [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%