1985
DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(85)90147-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of reading on physicians' nonadherence to recommended standards of medical care

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0
1

Year Published

1988
1988
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…in relation to cancer screening or prescribing prophylactic medication). This corresponds to reports that health promotion has been well received and seen as useful and interesting by doctors (Cohen et al. 1985, Dietrich et al.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…in relation to cancer screening or prescribing prophylactic medication). This corresponds to reports that health promotion has been well received and seen as useful and interesting by doctors (Cohen et al. 1985, Dietrich et al.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…[5][6][7] In addition, current therapies do not reduce symptoms to the same degree that 5HT 3 antagonist and corticosteroids do in early onset CINE. [15][16][17][18] In a review of studies concerning this topic, Cabana et al 19 found a variety of adherence barriers, such as lack of awareness and familiarity with the guideline and disagreement with the guideline, and physician-based factors, such as lack of belief in the effectiveness of guideline-driven management, lack of confidence in the ability to implement the guidelines, and inertia of previous practice. Recommendations for the use of oral metoclopramide or 5HT 3 receptor antagonists in conjunction with corticosteroids for high-dose cisplatin-based therapy have also been slowly and incompletely adopted.…”
Section: Hemotherapy-induced Nausea and Emesis (Cine)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most recent and thorough systematic review of the evidence for printed information as an intervention to change practitioner behaviour [61] included several randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with a no-intervention control [64-70]. These studies reported mixed results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%