1983
DOI: 10.2307/747337
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Reading on Second Language Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
177
0
12

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 318 publications
(201 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
12
177
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…This means that the only form of exposure to real world English available to the student will be the printed form. Elley and Mangubhai (1983) found that a group of Fijian children improved their English language proficiency at twice the normal rate, in their "Book Flood" study. Subsequently, Elley (1991) showed striking increases in measures of language use, by students involved in his "Book Flood" studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that the only form of exposure to real world English available to the student will be the printed form. Elley and Mangubhai (1983) found that a group of Fijian children improved their English language proficiency at twice the normal rate, in their "Book Flood" study. Subsequently, Elley (1991) showed striking increases in measures of language use, by students involved in his "Book Flood" studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Students tend to learn more when they are actively engaged, particularly when they are engaged in reading and writing (Elley & Mangubhai, 1983;Guthrie et al, 2001;Taylor, Frye, & Maruyama, 1990). However, at Hill, Teachers were more likely to ask students to engage in passive than active activities.…”
Section: Teacher Interaction and Expected Pupil Responsementioning
confidence: 93%
“…For instance, in an experimental study involving a control and an experimental group, Elley and Mangubhai (1983) studied the influence of extensive reading on children. They found that children who did extensive reading showed better progress in receptive skills (i.e., reading and listening) than the control group.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%