2017
DOI: 10.1111/polp.12203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Punitive Immigrant Laws on the Health of Latina/o Populations

Abstract: This study examines how anti-immigrant policies affect the physical health of Latina/os in the United States. Merging two unique datasets: sum of anti-immigrant policies by state from 2005–2011 and a 2011 Robert Wood Johnson Center for Health Policy nationally representative sample of Latina/os (n=1,200), we estimate a series of logistic regressions to understand how anti-immigrant legislations are affecting the health of Latina/os. Our modeling approach takes into consideration Latinos’ diverse experience, co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In light of current shortages, high turnover rates, low retention rates, 1,9,24 growing demand for direct care workers, 11 and immigrants' already disproportionate role in filling such jobs, policies that curtail immigration are likely to compromise the availability of care. Moreover, the anti-immigrant rhetoric and policies that restrict immigration threaten the health and well-being of immigrants [25][26][27] who are entrusted with the care of the nation's elderly and disabled people.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In light of current shortages, high turnover rates, low retention rates, 1,9,24 growing demand for direct care workers, 11 and immigrants' already disproportionate role in filling such jobs, policies that curtail immigration are likely to compromise the availability of care. Moreover, the anti-immigrant rhetoric and policies that restrict immigration threaten the health and well-being of immigrants [25][26][27] who are entrusted with the care of the nation's elderly and disabled people.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To measure state-level public sentiments about immigrants, Morey et al and Van Hook et al utilized 5 items from the General Social Survey (GSS) regarding attitudes towards increasing immigration, attitudes towards undocumented/unauthorized immigration, and beliefs about immigrants’ effects on job opportunities, crime, and the economy (79, 127). The stress and fear associated with undocumented/unauthorized status and the risk of deportation is not only prevalent among those without legal-residency status but also among their friends and family who experience what has been termed “vicarious illegality” and among all persons whose legal presence in the U.S. is questioned because of their race/ethnicity (12, 43, 134). Thus, studies utilizing these methods help to identify the broader, spillover effects of restrictive policies and anti-immigrant sentiments on groups and individuals not specifically targeted by such policies.…”
Section: Identification and Measurement Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immigration policy also shapes immigrants’ health (Acevedo-Garcia and Almeida 2012). Latinas/os living in states with low- or medium-level punitive immigration laws report better self-rated health than immigrants in states with high levels of anti-immigrant laws (Vargas et al 2017). And the deleterious health consequences associated with interior immigration enforcement are multigenerational (Rabin 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasingly harsh U.S. immigration policies have amplified the level of threat for the well-being of immigrants and their families, especially for Latinas/os who are the preeminent targets of enforcement today. Scholarship has pointed to the consequences of anti-immigration policies on immigrants’ health (Asad and Clair 2018; Vargas, Sanchez, and Júarez 2017). Research also finds Latinas/os encounter structural barriers to access health care (Jacquez et al 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%