The Impact of Public Interventions on Self-Sustainable Venture Capital Market Development in Latvia from the Perspective of VC Fund Managers

Abstract

This paper presents the results of a study on the impact of EU structural funds on the development of a self-sustainable venture capital (VC) market in Latvia from the perspective of VC fund managers. The study had two objectives. The first was to assess the contribution of European Union (EU) structural funds (SF) programmes toward the development of a self-sustainable VC industry in Latvia. The second was to identify ways by which the structural fund support could be better exploited for the development of the VC industry in Latvia. During three SF planning periods, the stated primary goal of the programmes to support high-growth SMEs was attained—to date, 294 VC investments have been made by publicly supported hybrid VC funds. During the 2004–2006 planning period, the first generation of professional VC fund managers in Latvia emerged in response to the opportunity to manage publicly supported hybrid VC funds. During the subsequent programmes, a high continuation rate by the established managers was observed. Nevertheless, Latvian VC fund managers are not yet capable of raising private funds and still encounter difficulties in attracting the necessary level of private capital for the publicly supported hybrid VC funds. The novelty of the study is the finding that improvements in the SF programme designs did not significantly decrease the impact of factors identified as limiting the success of the operations of VC managers. This suggests and confirms conclusions of other studies that argue that public policies aimed at creating healthy and supporting conditions for VC activity are necessary in addition to public financial support for VC funds. Regarding the next planning period, the suggestion regarding programme design is to continue with already started improvements: increasing the volume of funds, widening the geographic area eligible for investments, reducing restrictions on the types of financial instruments that may be used, lowering the administrative burden for VC fund managers and avoiding micromanagement of VC funds by governmental agency. The observation that the influence of investments in VC funds on the governmental agency’s responsible for VC investments financial statements may be partly responsible for the tendency to micromanage VC funds could be useful not only in Latvia but also in other countries.

Effective Venture Capital Market Development Concept

“…By the market statistics approach, all VC investments in a particular country's portfolio companies notwithstanding the funds' location are aggregated. As many countries have small internal markets, their VC funds tend and even are advised [24] to invest in a broader region as their establishment country. Therefore, when analyzing VC supply-side development, the industry statistic providing information about local VC fund investments is used often.…”

“…Dependency on public support in many countries, even after long-term public support [24], could signal severe deficiencies in the design of interventions.…”

Government's impact on the venture capital market and small-medium enterprises' survival and growth in East Africa, evidence from Uganda

“…They discovered that the portfolio companies do not demonstrate a substantial increase in total business worth and declined in the later years of the programme as public funding was enlarged. From this, it can be inferred that the size and superiority of the VC market regulates the proficient capacity and nature of government intervention Matisone and Natalja (2020) While Cumming and Macintosh (2006) provided their outcry about conflict of interest hampering the evolution of an early startup, Bertoni and Tykvova (2015) and Cumming et al…”