2016
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw2359
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of protocluster environments atz= 1.6

Abstract: We investigate the effects of dense environments on galaxy evolution by examining how the properties of galaxies in the z = 1.6 protocluster Cl 0218.3−0510 depend on their location. We determine galaxy properties using spectral energy distribution fitting to 14-band photometry, including data at three wavelengths that tightly bracket the Balmer and 4000Å breaks of the protocluster galaxies. We find that two-thirds of the protocluster galaxies, which lie between several compact groups, are indistinguishable fro… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
3
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…4). Such higher dust obscuration of galaxies in local overdensities for a given stellar mass range is consistent with the results of past studies (Koyama et al 2013b;Hatch et al 2017) that have investigated the environmental dependence of dust reddening of galaxies on a more global scale. However, our measurement of the dust reddening is based on the SED-fitting under the assumption of fixed stellar metallicity and limited star formation history.…”
Section: Environmental Dependence Within the Protoclustersupporting
confidence: 91%
“…4). Such higher dust obscuration of galaxies in local overdensities for a given stellar mass range is consistent with the results of past studies (Koyama et al 2013b;Hatch et al 2017) that have investigated the environmental dependence of dust reddening of galaxies on a more global scale. However, our measurement of the dust reddening is based on the SED-fitting under the assumption of fixed stellar metallicity and limited star formation history.…”
Section: Environmental Dependence Within the Protoclustersupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This is consistent with the 8 AGN found using the "Goldilocks" sample in Section 2.2. Therefore, we conclude that our result of the AGN enhancement in the protocluster is robust to the protocluster member selection technique used in Hatch et al (2017).…”
Section: Robustnesssupporting
confidence: 52%
“…We also find that the AGN picked out as part of the test protocluster sample, and not the "Goldilocks" sample, are either massive and red, or blue. They all lie within the region of the colour-mass diagram where > 75% of protocluster members would be correctly identified (Hatch et al 2017). It is therefore unlikely that we are missing any protocluster AGN due to the protocluster membership selection criterion.…”
Section: Robustnessmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Of particular relevance here is the SCUBA-2 survey of the clusters by Ma15, which discovered an overdensity of submillimeter galaxies (SMGs) in its core. Unlike other (proto-)clusters studied at high redshifts (e.g., CLG J0218; Rudnick et al 2012;Lotz et al 2013;Hatch et al 2016), XCS J2215 appears structurally well-developed. By combining XMM-Newton and Chandra observations, Hilton et al (2010, hereafter H10) Carlberg et al (1997;where R 200 is the radius from the cluster center within which the mean density is 200 times the critical density at the redshift of the cluster), H10 used an iterative method to estimate a line-of-sight velocity dispersion of σ v =720±110 km s −1 from the 31 galaxies with spectroscopic redshifts within R 200 =0.8±0.1 Mpc or 100″.…”
Section: Xcs J22159-1738mentioning
confidence: 64%