The impact of professionals’ knowledge on innovation adoption in the construction industry: A critical literature review

Abstract

The construction industry is one of the leading economic sectors in any country yet is renowned for its reluctance to adopt novel innovations. Meanwhile, research has found that the decision of any industry on the adoption or rejection of innovations depends on its positive or negative perception, which is stipulated by industry professionals’ knowledge. Therefore, this research aims to disclose how the professionals’ knowledge affects successful innovation adoption specific to the construction industry. A qualitatively based extensive literature synthesis has been conducted concerning three concepts to provide a holistic view of innovation decisions. Namely, the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), Technology-Organisation-Environment framework (TOE), and Diffusion of Innovation theory (DOI). The findings revealed that the "existing knowledge" of professionals was a key factor in innovation decisions. Accordingly, five main perceived attributes (relative advantage, compatibility, complexity, trialability and observability) have been identified through Roger’s innovation-decision model, and decisively common measurement items have been documented under each perceived attribute that comprehensively endorses the "existing knowledge" of construction professionals. Furthermore, this contemporary study found that all the recognised measurement items extensively affect innovation-decision. In the absence of a pragmatic decision framework, this article provides a clear impression for both technology developers and their users/stakeholders on crucial elements of innovation adoption that have been concerned via decision makers' technological perception.

Navigating the Complexity of Construction Contracts and the value of Blockchain Technology: A Systems Dynamics Perspective - Review Paper

“…Stakeholders can track the progress of contractual obligations as they are being fulfilled. This real-time oversight enhances transparency and ensures that all parties adhere to the contract terms, as emphasized by Weerapperuma et al (2023).…”

“…The recent incorporation of technologies like BIM and blockchain has further complicated construction contracts. These technologies offer potential benefits but also pose challenges in terms of legal recognition and implementation (Huzaimi Abd Jamil & Syazli Fathi, 2019; Weerapperuma et al, 2023).…”

“…Bridging Traditional Practices and Technological Innovations: With the advent of blockchain and smart contract technologies in construction, systems thinking becomes even more pertinent. It allows for the examination of how these technologies can integrate with and enhance traditional contract practices, addressing gaps such as transparency and efficiency (Huzaimi Abd Jamil & Syazli Fathi, 2019; Weerapperuma et al, 2023).…”

“…The systemic interaction of various elements within construction contracts is a critical area where systems thinking can offer profound insights. Weerapperuma et al (2023) emphasize the interconnectedness of contract components, arguing that changes in one area can significantly impact others. This section explores these interdependencies and how they manifest in construction contracts.…”

“…Verification: The auditability of blockchain, emphasized by Weerapperuma et al (2023), is particularly beneficial for compliance tracking. The blockchain ledger provides a chronological and unalterable record of all actions, decisions, and transactions, making it an invaluable tool for auditing and verifying compliance.…”