2011
DOI: 10.1080/15332691.2011.539175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of PREPARE on Engaged Couples: Variations by Delivery Format

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both GWW and CS participants were allotted time for structured couple exercises, modeling, and couple dialogue throughout their respective sessions. As both delivery formats have been found to yield equivalent significant short‐term changes in various relationship measures (Futris et al., ), data from both groups were combined.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both GWW and CS participants were allotted time for structured couple exercises, modeling, and couple dialogue throughout their respective sessions. As both delivery formats have been found to yield equivalent significant short‐term changes in various relationship measures (Futris et al., ), data from both groups were combined.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, less research has explored short-term change following PREPARE using noninventory measures (see Busby, Ivey, Harris & Ates, 2007), further contributing to the lack of general research across psycho-educational relationship programming as a whole (see Sprenkle, 2012). Specifically regarding PREPARE, one quasi-experimental study found participating couples to "improve" to a more positive couple typology post-program (Knutson & Olson, 2003), and a nonexperimental study found significant positive shifts from pretest to posttest in areas of relationship satisfaction, communication, and confidence (Futris, Barton, Aholou & Seponski, 2011).…”
Section: Premarital Education and Couple-based Risk Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The commonality between these three elements is a sense of safety they each bring into the relationship (Stanley et al, 1999). Research has demonstrated that these preventive interventions for couples can increase confidence in their relationships, feelings of readiness for marriage (Futris et al, 2011; Knutson, 2003), and more positive conflict management behaviors (Futris et al, 2011), as well as reduce marital distress and divorce (Stanley, 2001).…”
Section: Intervention Programs Aimed At Improving Marital Conflictmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Couples who participated in PREP strengthened their relationships (Stanley et al, 2004) and learned conflict management skills (Markman, Stanley, et al, 2010). When assessed years after their training (e.g., 12 months, Halford et al, 2003; 1.5–5.5 years after the program, Schilling et al, 2003; 5 years, Futris et al, 2011), PREP couples reported improved communication skills, positive affect, problem‐solving skills, and support/validation in comparison to control couples. Furthermore, couples continue to use the conflict management skills they learned in PREP over a period of 10 years (see Markman & Rhoades, 2012 for a review).…”
Section: Marriage In Iran’s Cultural Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%