2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-009-0616-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of preoperative breast MRI on the re-excision rate in invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
104
1
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 183 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
5
104
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…All ILC sites were detected on MRI, which is rarely the case of conventional mammograms or sonograms (3,25). Moreover, some studies (29,30) have suggested that the rate of local recurrences is higher in patients who undergo re-excision than in patients who are initially successfully treated, and our findings therefore imply that preoperative MRI could improve local control (12).…”
Section: Mri-pathological Correlationmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…All ILC sites were detected on MRI, which is rarely the case of conventional mammograms or sonograms (3,25). Moreover, some studies (29,30) have suggested that the rate of local recurrences is higher in patients who undergo re-excision than in patients who are initially successfully treated, and our findings therefore imply that preoperative MRI could improve local control (12).…”
Section: Mri-pathological Correlationmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Positive pathological margins after conservative surgery are more frequent in ILC than in IDC (8), leading to more frequent re-excision and local recurrence risk (12).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This preoperative tool reduces the need for re-excision after BCS 22,23 . However, a recent meta-analysis has demonstrated that preoperative MRI potentially increases the mastectomy ratio 24 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the theoretical benefit of MRI in preoperative planning, previous papers identified two main study end-points; the first was a shortterm benefit via reducing the re-excision rate [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] ; the second was long-term benefit resulting in improved disease recurrence rate and survival. 27 In view of disease recurrence and mortality being so rare in the modern era, most studies were unable to provide data on the second end-point.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%