2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2010.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of prehospital activation of the cardiac catheterization team on time to treatment for patients presenting with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cone, et al ., showed that prehospital ECGs combined with prehospital cardiac catheterization lab activation reduced door to balloon time by 50 minutes, from 87 to 37 minutes, 16 and Camp-Rogers, et al ., demonstrated a 22-minute reduction in FMC2B time with prehospital cardiac catheterization lab activation. 10 In contrast, the 64% rate of patients with a prehospital ECG who met the 90-minute FMC2B goal in our study was similar to the 68% rate reported from five organized regional STEMI networks. 13,17 In our data, prehospital ECGs were associated with a 12-minute reduction in door-to-balloon time (61 vs 50 minutes), with the difference between groups being a shorter time from hospital arrival to cardiac catheterization lab arrival and shorter door to balloon time for those with prehospital ECGs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Cone, et al ., showed that prehospital ECGs combined with prehospital cardiac catheterization lab activation reduced door to balloon time by 50 minutes, from 87 to 37 minutes, 16 and Camp-Rogers, et al ., demonstrated a 22-minute reduction in FMC2B time with prehospital cardiac catheterization lab activation. 10 In contrast, the 64% rate of patients with a prehospital ECG who met the 90-minute FMC2B goal in our study was similar to the 68% rate reported from five organized regional STEMI networks. 13,17 In our data, prehospital ECGs were associated with a 12-minute reduction in door-to-balloon time (61 vs 50 minutes), with the difference between groups being a shorter time from hospital arrival to cardiac catheterization lab arrival and shorter door to balloon time for those with prehospital ECGs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…52 Field activation of the catheterization laboratory while the patient is en route to the hospital has been associated with 14 to 43 minute shorter reperfusion times compared with waiting for hospital arrival before catheterization laboratory activation, with the greatest benefits during off-hours and for patients with long transport times. 19,[53][54][55][56] Although paramedics can reliably interpret STEMI on prehospital ECGs and this is the most common means of field diagnosis of STEMI, 57,58 uptake of catheterization laboratory activation by paramedics has been impeded in some regions by concerns about high false activation rates. With enhanced paramedic training and use of computerized programs for ECG interpretation, similar catheterization laboratory activation cancellation rates have been demonstrated for paramedic and ED physicians.…”
Section: Prehospital Ecg and Catheterization Laboratory Activationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several regional programs with this purpose have shown promising results, 8---11 and various prehospital primary PCI activation strategies (similar to that initiated in our hospital, but with smaller sample sizes) have achieved improvements in ischemia times. 12,13 SD is the best ischemia time interval to evaluate a regional primary PCI network, as it involves the coordination of all of the network's components. Furthermore, it is directly related to in-hospital mortality in STEMI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%