2017
DOI: 10.22237/jmasm/1509494640
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Predictor Variable(s) with Skewed Cell Probabilities on Wald Tests in Binary Logistic Regression

Abstract: A series of simulation studies are reported that investigated the impact of a skewed predictor(s) on the Type I error rate and power of the Wald test in a logistic regression model. Five simulations were conducted for three different regression models. A detailed description of the impact of skewed cell predictor probabilities and sample size provide guidelines for practitioners wherein to expect the greatest problems.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alongside different screening protocols and different regional prevalence of risk factors for GDM, this affected regional contribution to inclusion in the study and may have impacted on maternal characteristic profiles. However, we controlled for inclusion bias by adjusting for the regional annual year‐specific GDM prevalence which captures both known and unknown determinants of GDM diagnosis, and the large sample size can further be expected to sufficiently overcome issues with skewed predictor covariates in logistic regression analyses, thereby compensating for these limitations 37 . The evidence for an impact on clinical outcome by the implementation of lower diagnostic thresholds is further inconclusive 38 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Alongside different screening protocols and different regional prevalence of risk factors for GDM, this affected regional contribution to inclusion in the study and may have impacted on maternal characteristic profiles. However, we controlled for inclusion bias by adjusting for the regional annual year‐specific GDM prevalence which captures both known and unknown determinants of GDM diagnosis, and the large sample size can further be expected to sufficiently overcome issues with skewed predictor covariates in logistic regression analyses, thereby compensating for these limitations 37 . The evidence for an impact on clinical outcome by the implementation of lower diagnostic thresholds is further inconclusive 38 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we controlled for inclusion bias by adjusting for the regional annual year‐specific GDM prevalence which captures both known and unknown determinants of GDM diagnosis, and the large sample size can further be expected to sufficiently overcome issues with skewed predictor covariates in logistic regression analyses, thereby compensating for these limitations. 37 The evidence for an impact on clinical outcome by the implementation of lower diagnostic thresholds is further inconclusive. 38 Moreover, the exposure was not GDM diagnosis but the mode of treatment at the time of delivery, and the proportion managed on the reference treatment nutrition therapy in regions applying IADPSG/WHO 2013 criteria was not significantly different from regions applying higher diagnostic thresholds (data not shown).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ref. [16] analyzed logistic regression when some of the explanatory variables have skewed cell probabilities and lastly [17] considered the logistic model proposed by [1] to examine correlated infant morbidity data. More recently, Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pérez-Sánchez et al (2014) studied the risk variables underlying automobile insurance claims taking into account the asymmetry of the database. Alkhalaf and Zumbo (2017) studied logistic regression when some of the predictors have skewed cell probabilities and finally Mwenda et al (2021) uses the logistic model proposed by Prentice (1976) to study correlated infant morbidity data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%