2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of preanalytical variables on measuring cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease diagnosis: A review

Abstract: A unified CSF handling protocol is recommended to reduce preanalytical variability and facilitate comparison of CSF biomarkers across studies and laboratories. In future, experiments should use a gold standard with fresh CSF collected in low binding tubes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
110
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 161 publications
(141 reference statements)
4
110
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, specific cutoff points for CSF biomarkers differ between these studies, and several methodological differences can explain these discrepancies. First, preanalytical conditions, such as the type of collection and storage tubes, are different between studies, and these factors are known to have a great impact on the absolute values of CSF biomarkers, especially for A β 1‐42 . Second, some analytical particularities for each immunoassay and platform used in these studies (specificity of the antibodies, time of incubation) result in diverse CSF biomarker measures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, specific cutoff points for CSF biomarkers differ between these studies, and several methodological differences can explain these discrepancies. First, preanalytical conditions, such as the type of collection and storage tubes, are different between studies, and these factors are known to have a great impact on the absolute values of CSF biomarkers, especially for A β 1‐42 . Second, some analytical particularities for each immunoassay and platform used in these studies (specificity of the antibodies, time of incubation) result in diverse CSF biomarker measures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this strategy led to reasonable results, it does not allow for conclusions on the origin of observed variances. Potentially, differences in preanalytical protocols between the centres could be causative for the observed discrepancies, as the impact of preanalytical factors on biomarker levels is acknowledged well in research and assay manufacturer's instructions for standard AD markers in CSF and for immune markers in blood samples (though barely investigated for immune markers in CSF) . This would indicate that standardization and characterization of preanalytical confounders is of importance not only for the routinely used amyloid or tau isoforms but also for several immune markers frequently studied in CSF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, specific cutoff points for CSF biomarkers differ between these studies, and several methodological differences can explain these discrepancies. First, pre-analytical conditions, such as the type of collection and storage tubes, are different between studies, and these factors are known to have a great impact on the absolute values of CSF biomarkers, especially for Aβ1-42 [31,32]. Second, some analytical particularities for each immunoassay and platform used in these studies (specificity of the antibodies, In our study, we additionally included patients with other dementias or neurodegenerative diseases, which might reflect more realistically the application of biomarkers in daily clinical practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%