IJPS 2022
DOI: 10.36468/pharmaceutical-sciences.spl.575
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Pharmaceutical Electronic Bidding Procurement on Prices of Medicines: A Systematic Review

Abstract: An electronic bidding system promises to save resources in procurement procedures for many industries. While the results of previous studies in several countries sounded promising, it is concerning that more evidence would be needed to support changes in practice for the pharmaceutical sector. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of price saving in bidding-based electronic procurement setting and to clarify the main factors contributing to drug price changes. A comprehensive literature s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 42 publications
(143 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, these audit trails provide a complete historical record of procurement processes, thus enabling effective monitoring, evaluation and accountability. By automating specific steps in pharmaceutical procurement system, e-procurement system reduces the potential for human interference and bias (Pentrakan et al, 2022;Tinali, 2022). This, in turn, helps in mitigating the risk of corruption stemming from personal connections or undue influence.…”
Section: 23mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, these audit trails provide a complete historical record of procurement processes, thus enabling effective monitoring, evaluation and accountability. By automating specific steps in pharmaceutical procurement system, e-procurement system reduces the potential for human interference and bias (Pentrakan et al, 2022;Tinali, 2022). This, in turn, helps in mitigating the risk of corruption stemming from personal connections or undue influence.…”
Section: 23mentioning
confidence: 99%