2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-009-0237-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Perceived Ethical Culture of the Firm and Demographic Variables on Auditors’ Ethical Evaluation and Intention to Act Decisions

Abstract: auditor conflict, ethical culture, ethical decision making, underreporting of time, quality threatening behaviours, time pressure,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
147
1
16

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 198 publications
(194 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
10
147
1
16
Order By: Relevance
“…Sweeney et al 2010Sweeney et al , 2013. We believe that POS as a potential moderator can serve to influence individual factors highlighted in the literature.…”
Section: Appendix Scenario Used In This Studymentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Sweeney et al 2010Sweeney et al , 2013. We believe that POS as a potential moderator can serve to influence individual factors highlighted in the literature.…”
Section: Appendix Scenario Used In This Studymentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In contrast, Ford and Richardson (1994) conclude that there is a significant negative relationship between organizational size and individuals' ethical decision making such that, when the size of an organization increases, individuals' ethical behaviour decreases. However, more recent research has revealed a positive significant relationship between organizational size and ethical decisions or no significant relationship (Doyle et al 2014;Marta et al 2008;Pierce and Sweeney 2010;Sweeney et al 2010). Given the thrust of the more recent empirical research, this study hypothesizes:…”
Section: Organizational Sizementioning
confidence: 87%
“…Lightner et al (1982) surveyed auditors at the staff through partner levels and did not find a significant relationship between auditor level and underreporting time. However, Donnelly et al (2011) find experience level to be negatively associated with dysfunctional audit behavior (including underreporting time) and Sweeney et al (2010) find that auditor experience is negatively related to underreporting time. Accordingly, we expect experience to be negatively associated with underreporting acceptance.…”
Section: Auditor Experiencementioning
confidence: 96%
“…Some empirical research on underreporting of time uses pre-manager level auditors, as auditors at the staff and senior levels have been found to engage in higher levels of underreporting behavior (Otley and Pierce 1996;Pierce and Sweeney 2003;Sweeney and Pierce 2006;Sweeney et al 2010). Nevertheless, other studies on underreporting time use samples consisting of auditors at various hierarchical ranks, from the staff through partner levels (e.g., S. Lightner, Adams, and K. Lightner 1982;Margheim and Pany 1986;Donnelly et al 2003;Donnelly, Quirin, and O'Bryan 2011;Paino, Smith, and Ismail 2012;Agoglia et al 2015;Barrainkua and Espinosa-Pike 2015).…”
Section: Auditor Experiencementioning
confidence: 99%