The impact of ovarian stimulation on the outcome of intrauterine insemination treatment: an analysis of 8893 cycles

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the impact of ovarian stimulation on the outcome of intrauterine insemination (IUI). Design Retrospective analysis. Setting A single university‐based centre. Population A total of 5109 couples with 8893 cycles. Methods The outcome of IUI with different protocols for ovarian stimulation was examined. Main outcome measures The live birth rate (LBR), twin pregnancy rate and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). Results In ovulatory women without ovarian stimulation, the LBR was 7.6%. Stimulation with clomifene citrate (CC), letrozole (LE), human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG), CC or LE combined with HMG achieved LBRs of 6.1, 5, 7.9, 8 and 12.2%, respectively. LE combined with HMG achieved a significantly improved LBR compared with no stimulation. HMG stimulation was associated with a higher rate of twins (7.4%) than no stimulation (0%, P < 0.01). In ovulatory women, the LBR appeared lower in CC and LE compared with no stimulation (P > 0.05). In anovulatory women, ovarian stimulation with CC, LE, HMG, CC or LE combined with HMG achieved LBRs of 11.3, 5.1, 11.8, 12.6 and 13.6%, respectively. No significant difference was observed. There were no triplet pregnancies or OHSS in stimulated cycles. Conclusions In ovulatory women, ovarian stimulation with LE combined with HMG achieved a significantly improved live birth rate. HMG stimulation resulted in a high risk for twins. Tweetable abstract In ovulatory women, ovarian stimulation with letrozole and HMG resulted in a significantly improved LBR.

Controlled ovarian stimulation should not be preferred for male infertility treated with intrauterine insemination: a retrospective study

“…In addition, Liu et al [ 12 ] concluded that ovarian stimulation in ovulatory women undergoing IUI appeared to have a limited role, with the exception of LE and HMG. In their study, when all ovarian stimulation protocols were combined, no differences in pregnancy or live birth rates were found in ovulatory women.…”

The effect of slow release insemination on pregnancy rates: report of two randomized controlled pilot studies and meta-analysis

“…However, in the HHU and LIN studies, types of ovarian stimulation were distributed equally between the IUI and SRI groups (Table 2 ), whereas Muharib et al had not used ovarian stimulation at all [ 10 ]. Although ovarian stimulation is well known to improve IUI outcome [ 2 , 21 ], its lack in some cases should not have influenced the main results of this meta-analysis.…”

Factors Influencing the Success Rate of Intrauterine Insemination: ARetrospective Study in Sultan Qaboos University Hospital

“…However, when IUI is used, should ovarian stimulation be used at the same time? Some investigators have advocated using the natural cycle whereas others have claimed that ovarian stimulation may lead to better results [3].…”