2015
DOI: 10.1093/applin/amv060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Out-of-School Factors on Motivation to Learn English: Self-discrepancies, Beliefs, and Experiences of Self-authenticity

Abstract: This is the pre-publication of Henry A. & Cliffordson, C. (2015). The impact of out-of-school factors on motivation to learn English: Self-discrepancies, beliefs, and experiences of selfauthenticity. Applied Linguitics.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
48
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(36 reference statements)
5
48
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, these methodological limitations have not stopped scholars in the field from taking conclusions to the next level. By moving beyond theoretical implications, as Henry and Cliffordson () have recently cautioned, “through practitioner‐oriented volumes… [vision] has also found its way into language classrooms” (p. 732). This has led Henry and Cliffordson to compare the situation to a Kuhnian normal science where “central concepts are adopted uncritically and anomalies ignored” (p. 732) in reference to the argument that an understanding of vision aids teachers in increasing their students’ motivation (Kim & Kim, ; Muir & Dörnyei, ).…”
Section: Background Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, these methodological limitations have not stopped scholars in the field from taking conclusions to the next level. By moving beyond theoretical implications, as Henry and Cliffordson () have recently cautioned, “through practitioner‐oriented volumes… [vision] has also found its way into language classrooms” (p. 732). This has led Henry and Cliffordson to compare the situation to a Kuhnian normal science where “central concepts are adopted uncritically and anomalies ignored” (p. 732) in reference to the argument that an understanding of vision aids teachers in increasing their students’ motivation (Kim & Kim, ; Muir & Dörnyei, ).…”
Section: Background Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, the natural implication in such cases is the need for further research and more robust designs to better understand the phenomena in question, especially because SEM in particular relies on a set of stringent but often unmet assumptions (Goodboy & Kline, , p. 69). Many language motivation researchers may be reluctant to do this considering the Kuhnian normal science status that the L2 motivational self‐system has reached, which can give the perception that it is above critique (see Henry & Cliffordson, ). To ensure meaningful interpretation of existing results, a systematic replication program would allow our field to take stock of the best empirical evidence for a cumulative science.…”
Section: Replication Future Research and Open Science Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Henry & Cliffordson, 2015), as this global language is most 'associated with a non-parochial, cosmopolitan, globalized world-citizen identity' (D€ ornyei & Ryan, 2015:79). For Anglophone L2 learners, however, learning e by definition e a less globalized language, the pathway to IP is less obvious; nonetheless, it has been described in Anglophone learners with 'rebellious' orientation, posing the question of how this learner profile would be accounted for in a self discrepancy model.…”
Section: Anglophone Language Learnersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In at least one study (Moskovsky et al, 2016), the ideal L2 self was a negative predictor of language achievement. Moskovsky et al expressed their surprise that their results "suggest the unusual conclusion that learners with low ideal selves, low [positive L2 learning experience], and low [intended learning effort] are likely to achieve higher scores on L2 proficiency tasks" (p. 649; for further critiques of the ideal L2 self, see Gardner, 2010;Henry & Cliffordson, 2015;Hessel, 2015;Lanvers, 2016;Motha & Lin, 2014;Taylor, 2013, pp. 31-33).…”
Section: Achievement In L2 Motivation Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…does not do justice to the perceived desirability, accessibility, plausibility, and present-future discrepancy that the theory stipulates as conditions (cf. Henry & Cliffordson, 2015;Hessel, 2015). Expecting "I can imagine myself" to subsume all these complex facets is too optimistic.…”
Section: The Ideal L2 Selfmentioning
confidence: 99%