2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.12.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of organizational context on hard and soft quality management and innovation performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
118
0
9

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(162 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
4
118
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…The review showed that the more recent empirical academic literature has not focused on analyzing the effect that QM has on corporate sustainability in general and on EM practices in particular. Two types of studies were identified, according to their main outcomes: those establishing a negative relationship between QM and EM (see Table 3), which are in the minority (e.g., [69][70][71][72]), and those reporting positive results (see Table 4), stating that QM is closely related to the promotion of EM, and innovation in EM in particular (e.g., [24][25][26][27][28]35,36,42,[73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80]). Other authors, such as Steiber and Alänge [73], point out that while some aspects of QM could actually bring benefits to EM (e.g., environmental innovation), the question of whether QM as a whole does so is not very clear.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The review showed that the more recent empirical academic literature has not focused on analyzing the effect that QM has on corporate sustainability in general and on EM practices in particular. Two types of studies were identified, according to their main outcomes: those establishing a negative relationship between QM and EM (see Table 3), which are in the minority (e.g., [69][70][71][72]), and those reporting positive results (see Table 4), stating that QM is closely related to the promotion of EM, and innovation in EM in particular (e.g., [24][25][26][27][28]35,36,42,[73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80]). Other authors, such as Steiber and Alänge [73], point out that while some aspects of QM could actually bring benefits to EM (e.g., environmental innovation), the question of whether QM as a whole does so is not very clear.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zeng et al . () argue that centralization negatively affects managerial performance and affects technical performance positively, which means that outcomes vary according to the kind of performance investigated and competencies involved among different hierarchical levels. Martin et al .…”
Section: Centralizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…QM is applied in an array of service settings (Nilsson-Witell and Fundin, 2005), including healthcare (Talib et al, 2011), digitally connected services (Chen, 2008), and schooling (Fernández Cruz et al, 2016). In addition to the industry domains where it has an impact, many academic fields have produced research on QM; these include operations management (Zeng et al, 2017;Sousa and Voss, 2002), applied statistics (Hoerl and Snee, 2010), and management science (Douglas, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%