The impact of organisational culture, organisational structure and technological infrastructure on process improvement through knowledge sharing

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the mediator role that knowledge sharing plays between organisational culture, organisational structure, and technology infrastructure and process improvement in a knowledge management context in manufacturing enterprises operating in the food, beverage and textile industry. Design/methodology/approach An empirical study is conducted with a sample of 200 food, beverage and textile companies. Data are obtained by means of a survey questionnaire applied to general managers in each of the sample firms. The impact of the factors organisational culture, organisational structure and technology infrastructure on process improvement via knowledge sharing is assessed. Structural equation modelling and maximum likelihood estimation are applied to find the direction and strength of the relationships. Findings The main findings indicate the significant relationships between knowledge sharing and process improvement, between organisational culture and knowledge sharing, and between organisational structure and knowledge sharing. The relationship between technology infrastructure and knowledge sharing is found not to be significant. Research limitations/implications The findings of the present study are limited to the food, beverage and textile industry. Future research could incorporate data from other manufacturing sectors or service companies. Practical implications This study provides practical guidance for general managers who wish to implement process improvement programmes. Originality/value Several authors have noted that there are few research studies concerning the interaction between each phase of knowledge management and total quality management practices. This study is interested in knowledge sharing and its impact on process improvement in a knowledge management context.

Innovation speed and quality in higher education institutions: the role of knowledge management enablers and knowledge sharing process

“…This inadequacy is mainly rooted in the reasoning that HEIs are generally characterized by bureaucratic structure, individualistic culture, minimal existence of appropriate incentive system and lack of leadership support for KM behaviors (Kanwal et al, 2019;Muqadas et al, 2017). Existing literature indicates that knowledge sharing activities and the resulting innovative outcomes mainly center upon several organizational factors such as organizational structure and culture (Chi on et al, 2019), high-performance work systems (Bhatti et al, 2020;Gu ¨rlek, 2021), top management knowledge value (Singh et al, 2020) and reward system (Ali et al, 2019). Among these factors, top management knowledge-based support, conducive organizational culture and reward system have been identified as the prominent pillars supporting the knowledge sharing process in HEIs (Fullwood and Rowley, 2017;Kanwal et al, 2019;Lo and Tian, 2020;Muqadas et al, 2017;Ramjeawon and Rowley, 2017).…”

Knowledge Management and Economic Growth: The Assessment of Links and Determinants of Regulation

“…At the same time, the shortage of skilled workers slows down business development and leads to additional costs for human capital development (Grishnova et al, 2019;Bilan et al, 2020;Oliinyk, 2020). In this regard, we must indicate the significant links between knowledge sharing and organizational culture, but also between organizational structure and knowledge management (Chión et al, 2019).…”

An IT governance framework for IS portfolio management

“…This is done to guide organisational behaviour towards achieving a strategic objective IJMPB 14,3 (Di Berardino, 2016). To achieve this, the organisation and all its activities are required to be aligned with strategy (Chi on et al, 2019). This is achieved by applying coordinating measures on the three organisational levels, namely, the strategic, business and operational levels in the form of governance.…”