2023
DOI: 10.1080/01635581.2022.2162090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Nutritional Support on Survival Outcomes in Patients with Advanced Gastric Adenocarcinoma Treated with Chemotherapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, despite receiving anamorelin treatment, BW gain after 12 weeks remained at 47%, underscoring the importance of considering further treatment strategies for cancer cachexia. Sugiyama et al conducted a study on primary chemotherapy and nutritional support for unresectable advanced GC and found that nutritional support contributed to an extension in TTF, according to their multivariate analysis (Sugiyama et al 2023). Additionally, their study identi ed low BMI and an mGPS of 1 or higher as poor prognostic factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite receiving anamorelin treatment, BW gain after 12 weeks remained at 47%, underscoring the importance of considering further treatment strategies for cancer cachexia. Sugiyama et al conducted a study on primary chemotherapy and nutritional support for unresectable advanced GC and found that nutritional support contributed to an extension in TTF, according to their multivariate analysis (Sugiyama et al 2023). Additionally, their study identi ed low BMI and an mGPS of 1 or higher as poor prognostic factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite receiving anamorelin treatment, BW gain after 12 weeks remained at 47%, underscoring the importance of considering further treatment strategies for cancer cachexia. Sugiyama et al conducted a study on primary chemotherapy and nutritional support for unresectable advanced GC and found that nutritional support contributed to an extension in TTF, according to their multivariate analysis [29]. Additionally, their study identi ed low BMI and an mGPS of 1 or higher as poor prognostic factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the administration of home parenteral nutrition (PN) has shown improvements in nutritional markers like albumin, prealbumin, cholesterol, high‐density lipoprotein, and low‐density lipoprotein, it did not demonstrate a positive effect on overall survival (OS) 81 . Similarly dietary counseling and support did not significantly impact OS, but it was a prognostic factor for time to treatment failure, defined as the duration from start to discontinuation of chemotherapy 82 …”
Section: Clinical Impact Of Malnutritionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 81 Similarly dietary counseling and support did not significantly impact OS, but it was a prognostic factor for time to treatment failure, defined as the duration from start to discontinuation of chemotherapy. 82 …”
Section: Clinical Impact Of Malnutritionmentioning
confidence: 99%