Proceedings of 10th Symposium on Nuclei in the Cosmos — PoS(NIC X) 2009
DOI: 10.22323/1.053.0017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Nuclear Physics during Stellar Core Collapse

Abstract: Nuclear electron capture and the nuclear equation of state play important roles during the collapse of a massive star and the subsequent supernova. The nuclear equation of state controls the nature of the bounce which initially forms the supernova shock while electron capture determines the location where the shock forms. Advances in nuclear structure theory have allowed a more realistic treatment of electron capture on heavy nuclei to be developed. We will review how this improvement has led to a change in ou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(34 reference statements)
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The differences in shock progression (Fig. 2, upper) are comparable to, but smaller than, those seen by [20,19,21], who used the LMSH EC as we did, but larger than the differences seen by [22] who did not and therefore Y e reduction during collapse was dominated by capture on free nucleons, the abundances of which are affected by E sym . Each of the referred simulations used a different 15 M progenitor and a different opacity set which complicates the comparison.…”
Section: Nuclear Equation Of Statesupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The differences in shock progression (Fig. 2, upper) are comparable to, but smaller than, those seen by [20,19,21], who used the LMSH EC as we did, but larger than the differences seen by [22] who did not and therefore Y e reduction during collapse was dominated by capture on free nucleons, the abundances of which are affected by E sym . Each of the referred simulations used a different 15 M progenitor and a different opacity set which complicates the comparison.…”
Section: Nuclear Equation Of Statesupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The differences at bounce between the models using the LS and STOS EoSs originate primarily in the NSE region during collapse where the STOS EoS gives a lower abundance of heavy nuclei, resulting in less EC by nuclei [19] and therefore a larger initial shock position (0.49 M versus 0.44 M for the LS 180 EoS model, Fig. 2 lower).…”
Section: Nuclear Equation Of Statementioning
confidence: 99%