The impact of news exposure on collective attention in the United States during the 2016 Zika epidemic

Abstract

In recent years, many studies have drawn attention to the important role of collective awareness and human behaviour during epidemic outbreaks. A number of modelling efforts have investigated the interaction between the disease transmission dynamics and human behaviour change mediated by news coverage and by information spreading in the population. Yet, given the scarcity of data on public awareness during an epidemic, few studies have relied on empirical data. Here, we use fine-grained, geo-referenced data from three online sources-Wikipedia, the GDELT Project and the Internet Archive-to quantify populationscale information seeking about the 2016 Zika virus epidemic in the U.S., explicitly linking such behavioural signal to epidemiological data. Geo-localized Wikipedia pageview data reveal that visiting patterns of Zika-related pages in Wikipedia were highly synchronized across the United States and largely explained by exposure to national television broadcast. Contrary to the assumption of some theoretical epidemic models, news volume and Wikipedia visiting patterns were not significantly correlated with the magnitude or the extent of the epidemic. Attention to Zika, in terms of Zika-related Wikipedia pageviews, was high at the beginning of the outbreak, when public health agencies raised an international alert and triggered media coverage, but subsequently exhibited an activity profile that suggests nonlinear dependencies and memory effects in the relation between information seeking, media pressure, and disease dynamics. This calls for a new and more general modelling framework to describe the interaction between media exposure, public awareness and disease dynamics during epidemic outbreaks. Data Availability Statement: Data are available from the Zenodo repository (https://doi.org/10. 5281/zenodo.3603916).data, and we compare it with mentions of Zika in US news outlets and TV shows. We also compare the collective attention received by the outbreak with the incidence of Zika reported by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in each state. We find that the attention dynamics was highly synchronized across states, irrespective of the local risk of transmission of the virus. By building a linear regression model, we show that the dynamics of collective attention is highly predictable, even at state level, only based on the national media coverage received by the outbreak. PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGYNews exposure and collective attention during epidemics PLOS Computational Biology | https://doi.org/10.

Shifting to broad patterns of interests in conservation culturomics with Bayesian dynamic factor analysis

“…This was partially surprising, because lists of IAS can be perceived as a user-friendly tool to promote the concept of biological invasions through accessible examples, and because the Union list received media resonance. Differences in media coverage, and in the timing of the two initiatives, could probably explain these differences and we encourage future studies exploring the importance of media coverage and exposure over on-line information search about IAS, as media were already found to trigger on-line information search for other topics [21] .…”

GoogleTrends reflects the abundance of the Asian tiger mosquito (Aedes albopictus): a call for the web-based surveillance of invasive alien vector species

“…Whenever invasive alien pests are covered by media, often through sensational news, curiosity towards them peaks, as it does the amount of searches about them on the Internet [22] . This can blur the association between GoogleTrends and real population dynamics, and like in the case of Zika in the US [28] . While no epidemics occurred in the study area in our timespan, thereby not affecting our case study, the Emilia-Romagna region for example faced the first Chikungunya epidemics in Italy in 2007, and other epidemics occurred in Italy and Europe since then [29] [30] .…”

“…Researchers must be aware of their occurrence, before inferring population changes from online search volumes, and should discard areas and timespan affected by epidemics, or adopt ad-hoc approaches to data analysis. Longitudinal quantile regression [31] , for example, could be adopted to model the separate effect of the numerical abundance of a species and news volumes, extracted from GDELT [28] , on different volumes of searches on Google. By using this approach, researchers could observe a differential effect of these two components for different values of the GoogleTrends index, with media exposure being more predictive for periods with high search volumes.…”

COVID-19 has led to a global increase in web searches for bats: a risk for conservation ?

“…Information-searching behavior on the Internet can be a barometer to evaluate whether a certain topic is salient to laypeople [19] . Internet penetration has in fact increased over the last 15 years [20] and nowadays people search online for information about scientific [21] , environmental [22][23][24] [25] or health-related topics [26] . To quantify whether, and if so to what extent, people reacted to the media coverage on bats that followed COVID-19, we analyzed bat searches in Google, the leading search engine accounting for ca.…”